number of time

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "number of time" is not correct in English; it should be "number of times." You can use it when referring to the frequency of an event or action occurring.
Example: "The number of times I have visited that museum is quite high."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Variations over a number of time scales are observed.

Chemical Engineering Science

Lunga_strada "Yes, we need to cut the number of time zones in Russia.

The New York Times

Decimalisation will ease the problems of jet lag by cutting the number of time zones.

The Economist

An efficient quantum shear sorting (QSS) algorithm is used to reduce the number of time steps.

Tsinghua Science & Technology

Kendall's coefficient concordance (KCC) can measure the similarity of a number of time series.

NeuroImage

The time history of the applied load is segmented into a number of time intervals.

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

times the number of time-steps in the horizon.

University of California, Berkeley

frames – Unrolls a sequential circuit for the given number of time-frames.

University of California, Berkeley

Compassion can be cultivated through a number of time-tested practices.

Harvard Business Review

There are a number of time-tested practices that a high official can follow to avoid conflicts.

The New York Times

O'Reilly's telling takes as fact a number of time-worn myths that have been repeatedly disavowed by scholars.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "number of times" instead of "number of time" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "number of time" in your writing. The grammatically correct form is "number of times", which refers to multiple instances or occurrences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "number of time" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to quantify the frequency or count of occurrences. However, as noted by Ludwig, it is grammatically incorrect and should be "number of times".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

30%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "number of time" appears frequently across various sources, including scientific and news media as shown by Ludwig, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""number of times"". Despite the high occurrence, adhering to proper grammar is crucial for clear and effective communication. Be mindful to use the correct phrase or consider alternatives like "number of occurrences" or "frequency of times" to ensure accuracy and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

number of instances

Replaces "time" with "instances" to emphasize specific occurrences.

number of occurrences

Substitutes "time" with "occurrences", highlighting how often something happens.

frequency of times

Changes the structure to focus on the rate at which something occurs.

count of times

Uses "count" instead of "number" to denote a tallied amount.

how many times

Phrases it as a question, implying a need to quantify repetitions.

repetition count

Highlights the repetitions by using a noun-based phrase.

recurrence rate

Focuses on the rate at which something recurs.

incidence rate

Shifts the focus to the rate of incidence.

volume of times

Emphasizes the quantity of times something happened.

numerical frequency

Combines "numerical" with "frequency" to stress the quantifiable aspect of how often something happens.

FAQs

Why is "number of time" grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "number of time" is incorrect because "time" should be pluralized to "times" when referring to multiple instances or occurrences. The correct phrase is "number of times".

What is the correct way to use "number of times" in a sentence?

Use "number of times" when you want to express how frequently something occurs. For example, "The "number of times" I've visited Paris is three."

What can I say instead of "number of time"?

Since "number of time" is grammatically incorrect, use ""number of times"" instead. You can also use alternatives like "number of occurrences" or "frequency of times".

Is there a situation where "number of time" would be appropriate?

No, "number of time" is not grammatically correct in standard English. Always use ""number of times"" to refer to multiple instances.