number of servant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "number of servant" is not correct in English.
It should be "number of servants." You can use it when referring to the quantity of individuals employed as servants in a particular context. Example: "The estate had a large number of servants to maintain the property and assist the family."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Finally, a strictly limited number of servant staff are permitted for housekeeping and the preparing and serving of meals.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

A cure was brewing: the new super-luxury apartment house, where the number of servants could be halved while management took care of the halls, boiler room, repairs, deliveries, admitting guests and, if a restaurant was included, cooking and serving.

The New York Times

The Chancellor also complained about the Abbot's "excessive number" of servants.

Wikipedia

In April 1771, Louis Stanislas' education was formally concluded and his own independent household was established, which astounded contemporaries with its extravagance: in 1773, the number of servants reached 390.

Wikipedia

The go-to reply for monarchy-haters is that of course you live for ages if you're a human parasite with a huge number of servants tending to your every wish and you've never had to do a day's work in your life.

Vice

From the household of the king to the humblest peasant dwelling, more or less distant relatives and varying numbers of servants and dependents would cohabit with the master of the house and his immediate family.

Wikipedia

The decline in numbers of servants, linked to the introduction of electricity, central heating and labour-saving devices such as the vacuum cleaner, also led to changes in the scale of building.

Wikipedia

"That will look at issues around the number of civil servants and public servants that we have, issues around pay as well and we will consider that in the light of what the head of the civil service brings back to us".

BBC

No mention is made of the number of their servants.

The New York Times - Books

Ireland has also cut the number of civil servants.

The Guardian - Business

Nor has the number of civil servants grown over recent years – in fact, quite the reverse.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the plural form "servants" after "number of" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, "the number of servants in the household was substantial".

Common error

Avoid using the singular form "servant" after "number of". It should always be "number of servants" to correctly indicate a quantity of multiple individuals.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "number of servant" incorrectly attempts to quantify individuals in service. As Ludwig AI points out, the grammatically correct form is "number of servants". The primary function is to express a quantity of servants, but the incorrect singular form renders the phrase non-functional.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Encyclopedias

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "number of servant" is grammatically incorrect; the proper form is "number of servants". As Ludwig AI indicates, the singular form is inappropriate when referring to a quantity. To ensure clarity and correctness, always use the plural "servants". Though examples exist, especially in Wiki and News & Media contexts, remember to use the correct plural form in both formal and informal writing. Alternatives such as "quantity of servants" or "servant headcount" can also effectively convey the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

quantity of servants

Replaces "number" with a synonym maintaining the same meaning.

count of servants

Substitutes "number" with "count", which is similar in meaning.

servant headcount

Uses "headcount" to specify the number of servants.

number of staff

Substitutes "servant" with a broader term encompassing all personnel.

servant total

Expresses the quantity of servants using the word "total".

number of employees

Replaces "servant" with a more general term for workers.

number of domestics

Replaces "servants" with "domestics", referring to household staff.

servant complement

Uses "complement" to refer to the full number of servants.

servant workforce size

Specifies the "size" of the servant "workforce".

servant staffing level

Indicates the level of staffing specifically for servants.

FAQs

How to correctly use the phrase "number of servants" in a sentence?

Always use the plural form. For example, "The estate had a large "number of servants" to maintain the property".

What is a synonym for "number of servants"?

Alternatives include "quantity of servants", "count of servants", or "servant headcount". Each of these can be used to express the same idea.

Is it grammatically correct to say "number of servant"?

No, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""number of servants"", using the plural form of the noun.

What's the difference between "number of servant" and "number of servants"?

"Number of servant" is grammatically incorrect. "Number of servants" is the correct way to refer to the quantity of multiple servants.