Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The total number of the intracardiac neurons estimated per guinea pig heart was 2321±215, and this number did not differ significantly between young and adult animals.
In contrast to the actual mate number, the estimates of effective mate number did not differ significantly between species (S = 343, P = 0.2482).
Neuromast number did not differ significantly between the two populations in four lines: ET (P = 0.53), MD (P = 0.051), SO (P = 0.079), and ST (P = 0.086).
Despite a degree of interindividual variability, total cell number did not differ significantly between FasL-supplemented and unsupplemented cultures (AD 29.3/field±7.7; AD+FasL 24.8/field±5.6; 20 fields assayed), whereas adipocytes were considerably reduced in all FasL-supplemented cultures.
Similar(56)
Although the hsp70 copy number does not differ significantly between less tolerant O. pardalina and more thermotolerant S. singularior, the general organization of hsp70 genes is divergent in these two species.
Despite the evidence for strong positive selection acting on some antiviral immunity genes, there are generally few sites in the viruses of vertebrates, arthropods, or plants which exhibit detectable positive selection using the dN > dS test, and the number does not differ significantly between these groups.
Even though Treg counts were increased in asthmatic versus healthy children, their numbers did not differ significantly between children with allergic and non-allergic asthma.
A significant reduction was found in dy3K/δE3 diaphragm, both in young and older animals and the numbers did not differ significantly from wild-type diaphragm (Fig. 6B).
The bud numbers did not differ significantly between the variants.
The circulating neutrophil numbers did not differ significantly among the three groups (Supplemental table 2).
Total neuron numbers did not differ significantly among the groups, suggesting a special vulnerability of the TH-positive neurons to αSyn toxicity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com