The Supreme Court gave localities the authority to ban all nude dancing in a First Amendment case, City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. (a nude dance club).
"Crazy Horse," by Frederick Wiseman, tackles the mystique of nude dancing at a famous Paris club.
In fact, there were fewer problems in clubs with nude dancing as well as alcohol than in those serving alcohol but without nude dancing.
In a 1991 nude dancing case, he was willing simply to make the assumption of harm.
And the threat of further assaults on nude dancing looms large.
In 1991 the justices upheld an Indiana public indecency law that also banned nude dancing.
He wrote that the fee was not intended to suppress expression in nude dancing, but was directed instead at "the secondary effects of nude dancing when alcohol is being consumed".
They argued that nude dancing is a type of expression and that its free exercise should therefore not be inhibited.
A1 Nude Dancing Bans Upheld The Supreme Court ruled, 6 to 3, that cities and states may ban nude dancing as a way of fighting the crime and other "negative secondary effects" associated with places offering that kind of entertainment.
Is she suggesting that it's just a short step from banning nude dancing to creating a new Third Reich?
