Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
P > 0.05 (NS) was not considered significant.
The small correlation of the PHQ-15 and the EQ-5D index D (rs = −0.144, ns) was not significant.
To match imaging pathology with arthroscopic sampling of the synovium, the surgeon (NS) was not blinded to the patient's diagnosis, medication or US findings.
A Student's t test revealed that the difference between 2.81 and 2.76 ns was not statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval (p > 0.1, standard error about the mean 0.03 ns, sample size = 50).
For instance, a company claimed in the FAQ section that the NS was not a drug substitute, although one customer reported: " …Today, his blood sugars are more stable… so much so that the doctor wants him to start weaning him off of his insulin…".
However, for enhancing the chloride resistance and water resistance, 1%–2% NS was less effective compared to 10% MS probably because the filling effect of 1%22% NS was not as good as that of 10% MS. These results suggest that NS should not be added alone but should be added together with MS for best overall performance.
Similar(51)
It's official: Ned was not a cheater.
The leaching of NO3−-N was not affected by biochar in Acrisol.
Digestibility of N was not different, but N retention increased for HC and decreased quadratically for LC diets.
The parameter n was not identifiable but was tested using likelihood profiling with different arbitrary values.
The initial loading of the implant to 880 N was not recorded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com