I agree completely with this notion, and the text now clearly distinguishes multicelluarity from development, both in time of origin and proposed benefit.
This notion of the text's peculiar intractability isn't new.
These predicted results were found to be frequency-dependent and consistent with the notion in engineering dynamics texts that the closer the loading frequency approaches the resonant frequency, the larger the response is.
This idea does not address the problem of the inapplicability of a non-comparative notion of harm as discussed in the text.
Many stories in the text target the notion that utility is a naturally constant value particularly the human utility that Mozi champions.
We refer to [2, 4, 8, 23] for any undefined notion used along the text.
With appropriate definitions of those notions, the theorems about them would be susceptible of being reformulated making use of the defined notions, and the uneasiness described by Tarski in the text just quoted would be alleviated.
The lack of explicit commitment in the mature cell types in our model, as discussed earlier in the text, is consistent with the notion that entry into a lineage may at first be reversible.
The notion of a burly man singing Dido's lament seems odd in principle, but there is nothing in the text that should make it so, and Mr. Scholl's sensitive reading proved utterly persuasive.
This concern is addressed in the text.
