Note that the deviation in both, range and bearing, are highly dependent on the observed case.
Note that the deviation is less than 0.1 bps/Hz at R = 8.
Note that the deviation response defined in (20) is a regular sequence, which is amplified at each step.
The simulation results are shown in Figure 7 from which we note that the deviation between the simulation results and theoretical results is less than 0.5 dB.
Note that the deviation of 20 30 % from the selected value of Na − Nd or τn causes noticeable changes in the calculated spectra, i.e. the accuracy of determining these parameters by comparing the calculated and experimental results is quite high.
Note that the deviation from average was typically <20% over 30 s bins.
Note that the deviation between protein and mRNA quantification for one patient with mutation V606M might be because mRNA analysis for this specific patient was carried out on tissue initially frozen for histology.
Note that the deviation observed in the case of WAG is not simply accounted for by a difference in the observed and predicted number of substitutions (Δ n = 0.06, figure 3A), which suggest that the lack of adequacy of WAG lies in the way the substitutions are distributed either over the sites, over the branches, or over the 20 states.
It is also important to note the standard deviation on the simulations.
Note, the standard deviation obtained from analyzing multiple macro-samples does not correspond to the fluctuations exhibited in individual model simulations of the system or fluctuations between model simulations, but rather is a measure of experimental uncertainties (e.g., experimental measurement errors and non-identical systems), which are not taken into consideration by the model simulations.
