Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Note: item 10 score was reversed for factor analysis.
Note: item labels have been shortened to fit the table.
Note: Item loadings in bold indicate the factor they most heavily loaded on (and above 0.3).
The other factor included the rest 4 items: item 8 (writing will), item 7 (writing suicide note), item 5 (thought of people dying), and item 9 (telling others), which might be interpreted as morbid ideation and written signals of suicide.
Note: Item scoring range is 1 to 5; split-half reliabilities adjusted after Spearman-Brown; ITCs = item-total correlations Split-half reliability and internal consistency (coefficient alpha) were good for "Fear of Rejection".
Note: item scores are coded as 0 = strongly disagree, 25 = disagree, 50 = neutral, 75 = agree, 100 = strongly agree for the 5-point scale and as 0 = strongly disagree or disagree, 50 = neutral, 100 = strongly agree or agree for the 3-point scale; * CTM-3 items.
Similar(53)
On rare occasions, officials will note items of special interest to the president and forward them to national security staff members for further analysis.
Planning Note: Items with an asterisk should be reverse coded.
Note: Items denoted with * have been retained in the final 5 item CQR5 questionnaire.
NOTE: Items marked with * include very special adoptions for a survey in Germany.
Note: Items were scored on a scale from 1 'poor' to 5 'excellent'excellent
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com