Here, ν is a degeneracy index and the notation implies that continuous components in the indices (n, ν) are integrated.
The notation implies that the operations are applied to all variables i and values d in parallel.
The contextual notation implies that an asterisk subscript is used to identify dimensional variables and parameters only when ambiguity may arise when the asterisk subscript is not used.
Also in equations 5 7, the notation implies that the calculated structure factors are the instantaneous ones, whereas they should be the rolling averages.
The i and j in the foregoing notation imply the number of rows (in this case is the 302 individual households) and the number of columns (27 variables of adaptive capacity, exposure and sensitivity).
Note that despite the notation implying otherwise, (d_{x_{i},x_{j}}) refers to the distance of the navigation path from x j to x i ; it means the distance to get to x i from x j.
Again, in terms of our notation, MAR implies that f ( R | y, ϕ ) = f ( R | y obs, ϕ ), for all y miss, ϕ (2).
In a generic notation, this implies Y | t ∼ N (η, σ 2 ), with η the predictor for the mean, and variance σ 2. As an alternative, we will discuss two discrete distributions specifically aimed at the situation where the response variable is the (discrete) sum score of a cognitive test with range 0 up to n.
The first term in the d-products in Eq. (48) is d g ( 1, n, p, q ) according to Eq. (46) and the corresponding condition i 0 ≡ − 1, so for the brevity in our notation we imply: g ( 0, n, p, q ) ≡ − 1.
The notation "E a " implies the solution obtained for the X-point located at a-direction in the k-space.
They also exhibited higher T parameters (P = 8.4 × 10−12, Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni correction) and M parameters (P = 5.6 × 10−4, Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni correction) based on the TMN cancer staging notation system, which implies larger primary tumor sizes and higher distant metastatic spread, respectively.
