Sentence examples for notable rate of from inspiring English sources

Notable rate of formation of carbon dioxide, methane and hydrogen can be achieved under the heating to the supercritical temperatures above 400 °C.

There was a notable rate of lost to follow-up; however, mortality results including passive follow-up were similar to those without passive follow-up.

But as we move to increase awareness of discreet issues with high-performing students -- notable rates of depression, anxiety, sleep deprivation, cheating, drug use, etc. -- we risk missing the heart of the problem.

Patients receiving bolus versus maintenance dosing were more likely to have infection-related events, with the most notable rate differences for use of intravenous antibiotics and hospitalization for any infection.

It is notable that rates of response were not affected by such adverse prognostic features as del(13) and t(4; 14).

It is notable that rates of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use were high across all 3 groups in the current study, although use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors was only moderate.

It is notable that the rate of acetone evolution decreased with increasing cutoff wavelength, which is in good agreement with the UV Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of PbSnO3 nanoparticles, indicating the present reaction is driven by a visible light absorption.

There was a notable drop-out rate of about half of the original cohort members.

74, 76 Two retrospective reviews of Kern County birth records from the 1940s to the 1960s were notable for a rate of 7.7 11 coccidioidomycosis cases per 10,000 pregnancies, with a striking rate of death (33%) among women who had disseminated disease.

It is notable that the rate of unwillingness at first sex or being forced into sex was extremely high among females in our study compared to a study conducted among out-of-school youths in China [ 24].

However, it was notable that the rate of persistence/recurrence was higher in patients with multiple involved margin sections compared with patients who had a single involved margin (23.08 % vs. 9.91 %, P = 0.092).