notable lack of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "notable lack of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to highlight a significant absence or deficiency of something in a particular context. Example: "The report revealed a notable lack of evidence to support the claims made by the witnesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Score: 4 Guardian verdict: There has been a notable lack of scandal in the Obama administration.

The Guardian

This year has seen a notable lack of Qaeda members killed or captured in Pakistan.

The New York Times

Not that there was any notable lack of Bach in the spring.

The New York Times - Arts

Parsons was herself a celebrity, despite her notable lack of charisma, good looks or writing talent.

The New York Times

There's also a notable lack of physical description of the characters or, well, anything.

The Guardian - Books

In the whirlwind that is 2018, there has been a notable lack of high-end twisters.

The Washington Post

Some musicians display a notable lack of enthusiasm for the whole idea.

The New York Times - Arts

"I was like, I'm gonna show you," Marciniak says, with a notable lack of bitterness.

The New York Times - Books

The Japanese actors declaim corny English dialogue with a notable lack of conviction.

Independent

On the other hand, there is a notable lack of correlation between results derived from geodetic and seismologic data.

University of California, Berkeley

We will have a snow dome for skiers, not because the Northeast has a notable lack of hills, but because the hills have a notable lack of snow much of the year.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "notable lack of" to emphasize a deficiency that is significant or striking, drawing the reader's attention to its importance. For example: "There was a "notable lack of" preparation for the exam, resulting in low scores."

Common error

While "notable lack of" is grammatically correct, avoid using it excessively in casual writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "absence of" or "shortage of" to maintain a more relaxed tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "notable lack of" functions as a qualifier to emphasize the significance of an absence or deficiency. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct. Examples show it frequently used to draw attention to missing or inadequate elements across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

27%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "notable lack of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that serves to emphasize a significant absence or deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use. Predominantly found in news, media, and scientific contexts, it effectively draws attention to missing elements. While versatile, it’s best to avoid overuse in informal settings, opting for simpler alternatives when appropriate. This phrase is useful for writers aiming to highlight important shortcomings or absences in a clear and impactful manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

noticeable absence of

Similar, although the word "notable" suggest that it's worthy to be noted or easily noticed

remarkable absence of

The adjective "remarkable" suggests that the lack is worthy of attention because it is strange or unusual.

significant absence of

Focuses more directly on the absence itself, rather than the degree to which it's noticeable.

marked deficiency in

Emphasizes the inadequacy or shortage of something.

distinct shortage of

Highlights the limited quantity or supply of something.

considerable dearth of

A more formal way to express a significant lack, using a less common word.

obvious insufficiency of

Stresses that something is clearly not enough or adequate.

pronounced scarcity of

Indicates that something is rare and in short supply.

glaring omission of

Highlights a conspicuous absence, often implying it was intentional or a mistake.

evident inadequacy of

Similar to insufficiency but emphasizes that the inadequacy is clear and apparent.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "notable lack of"?

You can use alternatives such as "significant absence of", "marked deficiency in", or "distinct shortage of" depending on the context.

How do I use "notable lack of" in a sentence?

Use "notable lack of" to highlight a significant absence or deficiency. For example: "The investigation revealed a "notable lack of" evidence supporting the claims."

Is it appropriate to use "notable lack of" in formal writing?

Yes, "notable lack of" is suitable for formal writing as it clearly and effectively emphasizes a significant deficiency or absence.

What is the difference between "notable lack of" and "absence of"?

"Notable lack of" emphasizes that the absence is significant or striking, whereas "absence of" simply indicates that something is missing without necessarily highlighting its importance.