Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
By itself this kind of model is not very informative unless it integrates phylogenetic information.
> brief and not very informative.
Not very informative, you might think.
Individual genes are just not very informative.
Though the Register is not very informative, it is not without interest.
But even if the accounting was completely proper, it was not very informative.
It also plots LFP time series, so the name is not very informative.
Why? Firstly, it's not very informative – how many calories are you supposed to eat? How many have you eaten?
The comparison of those absolute values remains however, not very informative given the drastically different origin for the nitrogen pollution.
However, total health spending alone is not very informative.
Not very informative, but perhaps worth the 13 seconds it'll take to click and scroll.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com