not valuable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not valuable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks worth or significance in a particular context. Example: "The feedback provided was not valuable, as it did not address the main issues we were facing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Not valuable stuff.

The New Yorker

"If you can't fence the coin, it's not valuable.

The New York Times

The problem is not that public sector workers are not valuable, but rather they are overcompensated.

The Guardian - Opinion

And is stealing still stealing if it is something deemed not valuable, or then again, invaluable?

The Guardian - Music

That is not to say that other means of teaching are not valuable.

The Guardian

The cookbook was not valuable, but it met other criteria for restoration, sentiment and practicality.

The New York Times - Books

An art-historian friend thinks it is probably not valuable -- art-fair but not art-gallery quality.

The New York Times - Magazine

Likewise, players are not valuable to fantasy owners outside of a proper understanding of their opportunity cost.

The New York Times

And most waived players are not valuable enough for a team to invoke their Bird rights to keep them.

The New York Times - Sports

Data is not valuable unless you do something with it.

TechCrunch

That doesn't mean it's not valuable to Facebook.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not valuable" to downplay the cost when contrasting expense with sentiment or utility. Example: "The gift was "not valuable", but held significant sentimental importance."

Common error

Be careful not to confuse "not valuable" with "invaluable". "Invaluable" means extremely valuable or precious, the opposite of "not valuable". Use "invaluable" only when emphasizing high worth.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not valuable" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a lack of worth, significance, or importance. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its use in diverse contexts, confirming its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not valuable" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates a lack of worth, significance, or importance. Ludwig's AI analysis confirms its correctness and provides a wealth of examples spanning diverse contexts, from news and media to scientific publications. While generally neutral in register, it's essential to distinguish "not valuable" from its antonym, "invaluable", and choose the most appropriate alternative depending on the intended nuance. Remember to ensure clarity by defining the criteria for “value” in your context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

worthless

Direct synonym, implying complete lack of value.

of no value

Formal and direct way of saying something lacks value.

invaluable

While the word might sound similar to "not valuable", it means the opposite: extremely valuable or precious.

unimportant

Focuses on the lack of significance rather than monetary worth.

insignificant

Similar to "unimportant", highlighting a lack of consequence.

without merit

Emphasizes the lack of positive qualities or worthiness.

unproductive

Suggests a lack of useful outcome or result.

unprofitable

Specifically refers to a lack of financial gain or benefit.

fruitless

Describes something that does not yield positive results or outcomes.

irrelevant

Indicates a lack of connection or importance to the matter at hand.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "not valuable" in a sentence?

You can replace "not valuable" with terms like "worthless", "unimportant", or "insignificant" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "not valuable"?

Yes, the phrase "not valuable" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English to describe something lacking worth or importance. As Ludwig AI explained the expression is correct and usable.

What is the difference between "not valuable" and "invaluable"?

"Not valuable" means lacking in worth or importance, while "invaluable" means extremely valuable or precious. They are antonyms, so be mindful of the meaning you want to convey. The latter means the opposite of "not valuable".

When is it appropriate to use "not valuable" in writing?

Use "not valuable" when you want to express that something lacks monetary worth, significance, or importance. For example, "The information was "not valuable" for making strategic decisions".