Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not to lose
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not to lose" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing a desire or intention to avoid losing something, whether it be an opportunity, a game, or a relationship. Example: "I always try my best in competitions, not to lose my chance at winning the championship."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Trying not to lose?
News & Media
You played not to lose.
News & Media
Both try not to lose the kids.
News & Media
We were determined not to lose.
News & Media
They are determined not to lose it.
News & Media
Moyes set us up not to lose.
News & Media
Still, he tried not to lose hope.
News & Media
"Women play not to lose".
News & Media
He's probably trying not to lose it.
News & Media
It is important not to lose that.
News & Media
It is important not to lose momentum.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not to lose", ensure it clearly indicates the purpose or intention of avoiding a specific loss. For instance, "He trained rigorously not to lose the championship."
Common error
Avoid using "not to lose" vaguely. Always specify what you aim to avoid losing. Instead of saying "They played cautiously not to lose", clarify with "They played cautiously not to lose their lead."
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not to lose" functions primarily as an infinitive of purpose, indicating the reason or intention behind an action. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness. Examples show it describing goals, strategies, and motivations focused on avoiding negative outcomes.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Wiki
30%
Science
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Reference
7%
Encyclopedias
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "not to lose" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that conveys the purpose of avoiding a specific loss or negative outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread applicability. It appears most commonly in News & Media, Wiki, and Science contexts. While it maintains a neutral register, its usage spans from formal reporting to practical advice. To enhance clarity, ensure the intended loss is clearly defined in your writing. Alternatives such as "avoid losing" offer subtle variations in tone and formality, allowing for nuanced expression.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
avoid losing
Focuses on the action of evading a loss, emphasizing prevention.
avert defeat
Focuses on successfully preventing an impending loss.
prevent from losing
Highlights proactive measures taken to stop a loss from occurring.
guard against losing
Implies a defensive strategy to protect against potential loss.
ward off loss
Emphasizes deflecting or repelling circumstances that could cause a loss.
ensure against defeat
Stresses the importance of guaranteeing a non-losing outcome.
refrain from losing
Highlights the conscious decision to abstain from actions that could lead to a loss.
make certain of not losing
Emphasizes the assurance needed to avoid a loss.
steer clear of defeat
Suggests navigating to avoid a losing situation.
secure a win
Shifts the focus to achieving a positive outcome rather than avoiding a negative one.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "not to lose" to sound more positive?
You can use phrases like "to win", "to secure victory", or "to achieve success" to emphasize a positive outcome rather than avoiding a negative one.
Is it ever better to use "to avoid losing" instead of "not to lose"?
While both are correct, "to avoid losing" can sometimes sound more formal or deliberate, while "not to lose" might be perceived as more direct or urgent. Choose the phrasing that best fits the tone and context of your writing.
What's the difference between "not to lose" and "without losing"?
"Not to lose" expresses an intention or purpose, as in "I practice every day not to lose my skills". "Without losing" describes a condition or state, such as "He completed the race without losing his focus".
In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "not to lose"?
The phrase "not to lose" is appropriate in contexts where the primary focus is on preventing a negative outcome, such as in sports, business, or personal goals. It is useful when explaining strategies or motivations aimed at avoiding defeat or failure.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested