Sentence examples for not substantially more from inspiring English sources

Republicans, conservatives and men were not substantially more apt to view her negatively but were more likely to be withholding judgment.

The answer from Berlin is not so much, as Ms. Merkel is fond of saying, "more Europe," and it is definitely not substantially more money, but instead more Germany.

The Independent offers another analysis piece on the crucial role of the military in a transition of power: A present, despite its undoubted achievements in mobilising millions of Egyptians in protest against the established and military-backed political order, the opposition is not substantially more popular than the armed forces.

The travel covered two trips to Turkey, one in 2007 and another in 2009, and a trip to the Netherlands in 2009, which the board estimated were worth at least $11,000, though not substantially more in free travel expenses for Mrs. Markowitz.

The ET data show that, under solvent conditions favoring the folded protein, collapsed non-native structures are not substantially more stable than extended conformations, and that the two populations interchange rapidly.

More specifically, the graphs in Figure 1 shows that in terms of self-evaluation questions, scale perception is sensitive to age and that older individuals are not substantially more risk averse in terms of employment than younger individuals, within our sample of migrants.

At Pasta Flyer, the fettuccine Alfredo and fusilli with pesto might be healthier than heavily processed supermarket products, but they aren't substantially more exciting.

If our journalism does not offer substantially more value to readers than these alternative "news" sites, something is wrong.

Supernatural's version of Lucifer is a villain, but not a substantially more threatening one than anyone else who crosses the Winchesters.

Many consumers have already refinanced their mortgages in recent years, and both the business and consumer sectors have splurged on expensive, long-lasting durable goods and capital equipment in recent years, suggesting lower rates may not spur substantially more spending.

The court said that since the regulations imposed First Amendment constraints, they could be upheld only if they advanced "important governmental interests unrelated to the suppression of free speech" and did not "burden substantially more speech than necessary to further those interests".