In other words, means of all parameters had not significant differences in different months.
However, the statistical analysis of the results indicated those not significant differences among the different light treatments.
There are not significant differences between treatments (significance threshold, P < 0.05).
Based on the results of Table 5, we can notice that there are not significant differences to the tag discrimination metric among the different LO types.
There were not significant differences between CECs and CEPCs count either between the different groups or survivors and non-survivors.
Although different size glass beads were used, there were not significant differences in the separation performance because of their similar porosities.
There were not significant differences in ebullition fluxes between pond types (Mann-Whitney U Statistical test, p-value = 0.44).
Also cortisol and glucose concentrations had not significant differences between treatments.
There were not significant differences in strength and fatigue between two conditions (p>0.05).
According to the paired t-test, the analytical results were not significant differences at 95% confidence level.
Results indicated there were not significant differences regarding fecundity estimates between the gravimetric and auto-diametric method (p > 0.05).
