Exact(28)
Seven programs did not report sufficient information to reliably calculate either of these rates.
We excluded nonenglish articles and studies that did not report sufficient clinical information.
Unfortunately, the included studies did not report sufficient information to explore these issues.
Studies that did not report sufficient published data or original data were excluded.
Five studies did not report sufficient data to enable us to determine if results were positive or negative.
Many studies were excluded because publications did not report sufficient information to allow them to be included in the review.
Similar(32)
Previous studies have not reported sufficient evidence to guide these decisions.
On review 70 of these either did not meet the criteria to be considered manipulations or had not reported sufficient data, leaving 188 (73%) to be included.
Among the studies excluded from the review due to not reporting sufficient information to estimate predicted EQ-5D utility, two used Bayesian probability networks [ 10, 18]; this technique gave models with extremely good prediction accuracy, although it is unclear whether it is practical to publish such algorithms for use in other studies.
All trials did not adequately report sufficient information to judge baseline similarity, if co-interventions were avoided or comparable, or if there were any adverse events [ 24].
Six studies reported age-specific prevalences [26], [32], [38], [47], [49], [50] but data were not reported in sufficient detail to enable summary age-specific prevalences to be calculated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com