not providing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not providing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the absence of an action or service, typically in formal or professional contexts. Example: "The company is not providing adequate support for its employees during the transition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

We're not providing a service.

The New York Times

PCCs are not providing it.

The Economist

"They're not providing him with stability.

The New York Times - Sports

Jerrod was not providing details.

The New York Times - Sports

Not providing for my family scares me.

The Guardian - Music

But the trend lines are not providing much holiday cheer.

The New York Times

The west is not providing aid to develop a competitor.

The Guardian

They are not providing offensive production to justify the vulnerability.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

He did not provide details.

The New York Times

It did not provide specifics.

The New York Times

She did not provide details.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not providing", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking and who or what is affected. For example, "The government is "not providing" adequate healthcare services to its citizens."

Common error

Avoid using "not providing" without clearly stating what is not being provided. Vague statements can lead to confusion. For instance, instead of saying "The system is "not providing", specify what the system is failing to provide, such as "The system is "not providing" accurate data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not providing" functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence or lack of an action. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts, as exemplified in sentences where it highlights a deficiency or failure to supply something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not providing" is a commonly used verb phrase that indicates the absence of an action, service, or resource. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across diverse contexts. It serves to express a deficiency or a failure to deliver something expected. While versatile, clarity is key; ensure the context clearly defines what is "not providing". As showcased by Ludwig, it appears most frequently in news and media, science, and business-related contexts, making it suitable for both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failing to provide

Replaces "not" with "failing", emphasizing a failure or inability.

not supplying

Substitutes "providing" with "supplying", focusing on a lack of material or resources.

withholding

Implies a deliberate act of keeping something back.

denying

Suggests a refusal to give or grant something requested or expected.

lacking in providing

Emphasizes a deficiency in the act of providing.

not furnishing

Replaces "providing" with "furnishing", highlighting a lack of equipment or necessities.

omitting to provide

Formal alternative indicating a failure to include or supply.

not delivering

Focuses on a failure to bring or supply something promised or expected.

abstaining from providing

Highlights a conscious decision to refrain from giving or supplying.

deficient in providing

Indicates an inadequacy or shortfall in the act of providing.

FAQs

How can I use "not providing" in a sentence?

Use "not providing" to indicate a lack of something. For example, "The company is "not providing" sufficient training for its employees."

What are some alternatives to "not providing"?

Alternatives include "failing to provide", "withholding", or "lacking in providing", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "not providing" or "failing to provide"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "failing to provide" often carries a stronger connotation of responsibility or expectation. "Not providing" is more neutral.

What's the difference between "not providing" and "not offering"?

"Not providing" suggests something is expected or needed but is absent, while "not offering" implies something is available but not presented as an option. For example, a service might be "not providing" adequate support, while a company might be "not offering" a discount.