Suggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Such an inference was made in the Aristotelian and natural law traditions, but it is not obviously valid.
Similar(57)
Isn't it obviously valid?
While this criterion is obviously valid in sparse coding applications, it is not the criterion of choice in sparse classification.
Not only is the theory radically incomplete if it were completed, it would reduce a huge number of obviously valid arguments to invalidity by construing them as equivocal.
Not obviously so.
Not obviously.
Thanks to Theorem 4.5, this theorem is obviously valid for.
If J = 0, then (9) is obviously valid.
If (q=0), the inequality above is obviously valid.
Both are, obviously, valid points.
"It's obviously not a valid letter," Mr. Haddow said.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com