not interfere with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not interfere with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that one action or situation does not obstruct or disrupt another. Example: "Please ensure that your work does not interfere with the ongoing project deadlines."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It does not interfere with state law".

The New York Times - Health

Foreigners should not interfere with such things.

The Economist

The government must not interfere with business!

The New York Times

He does not interfere with passersby.

The Guardian

Its own review process must not interfere with them.

The Guardian

In any event, it does not interfere with his optimism.

The New York Times - Magazine

The authorities did not interfere with the demonstration.

The New Yorker

"But their inefficiency should not interfere with your data collection.

The New York Times

But most, she said, do not interfere with everyday life.

The New York Times - Health

"We should not interfere with contractual rights," Martens said.

The New York Times - Sports

And it does not interfere with Higher Power.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not interfere with" to clearly communicate that an action or process should not disrupt or hinder another. This phrase is useful in instructions, policies, and explanations where clarity and non-interference are important.

Common error

Avoid constructing sentences where it's unclear who or what is doing the interfering. Active voice often provides more direct and impactful communication. For example, instead of "The experiment should not be interfered with", use "Researchers should not interfere with the experiment".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not interfere with" functions as a negative constraint, indicating that a particular action or entity should refrain from disrupting or hindering another. Ludwig AI indicates that it is correct and usable in written English. This phrase serves to establish boundaries and ensure smooth operation, as demonstrated in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not interfere with" is a versatile expression used to convey the importance of non-disruption and maintaining operational integrity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is commonly found in both scientific and news media contexts, suggesting its wide applicability and neutral tone. Related phrases like "not impede" and "not obstruct" offer similar meanings but may carry slightly different connotations. When using this phrase, it's important to maintain clarity regarding who or what should avoid interference. This will ensure your writing is impactful and easily understood.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not tamper with

This alternative suggests a more forceful or deliberate action of intervention is avoided.

not intervene in

This alternative implies a deliberate act of getting involved in a situation.

not impede

This alternative focuses on preventing progress or hindering movement.

not obstruct

This suggests preventing passage or making something difficult to do.

not meddle in

This suggests an unwelcome or unsolicited involvement.

stay out of

Indicates a decision to not become involved in a situation.

not get in the way of

This alternative emphasizes avoiding physical or metaphorical obstruction.

not intrude upon

This alternative focuses on avoiding disruption or unwelcome presence.

leave undisturbed

Focuses on maintaining the current state without causing any disruption.

not encroach on

This implies avoiding the gradual taking over of someone else's rights or possessions.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "not interfere with" in a sentence?

You can use alternatives such as "not disrupt", "not hinder", or "not obstruct" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "not interfere with" or "not interfere in"?

"Not interfere with" is generally used when referring to a process or activity, while "not interfere in" is used when referring to a situation or event. For instance, "not interfere with the experiment" vs "not interfere in the dispute".

What does it mean when someone says something should "not interfere with" something else?

It means that the first thing should not disrupt, hinder, or obstruct the normal functioning or progress of the second thing. It implies a need for separation or non-involvement to ensure smooth operation.

How formal is the phrase "not interfere with"?

The phrase "not interfere with" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. It's a neutral and clear way to express the idea of non-interference, making it appropriate for a variety of situations.