The phrase "not in sequence" is correct and can be used in written English.
It typically means that something is not in the expected or logical order. Example: "The numbers in the given list are not in sequence, which makes it difficult to solve the problem."
Mr. LaRosa said the numbers were especially important in Rocky Hill because new construction had left some streets with addresses that are not in sequence.
But by intercutting between them, Daldry more or less persuades us that the three women's stories are atemporal, that they exist alongside each other not in sequence but in parallel.
Some scenes appear to run not in sequence but, as it were, in parallel: we observe Munho alone, seated at the side of a sports arena, wrapped in a scarf; then we see him, bare-necked, approach a group of his students — same time, same place, same dazzle of sun and snow — and accept a scarf from them.
Travolta is still alive, and arguing over towels, because the stories, despite some overlap, are not in sequence, and no attempt has been made to lock them into a unified, flowing progression in the viewer's head by using flashbacks, flash-forwards, parallel cutting among ongoing narratives, or any other means.
The Imagist movement, started in England in 1912 by Aldington, Pound, Flint, and Hilda Doolittle ("H.D")., was concerned with more than versification, but one of its principles was "to compose in sequence of the musical phrase, not in sequence of the metronome".
As regarding rhythm: to compose in sequence of the musical phrase, not in sequence of the metronome.
The difference from the control is that the TCM compounds interact with amino acids and become H-bonded in sequences 20 28 and 147 157, but not in sequences 90 98.
The key differences stated by the author is that task demand information is non-spatial, and that this is encoded not in sequences but in firing rates of replays.
The key differences are that the nature of the task is a non-spatial datum, and that this is encoded not in sequences but in firing rates of replays.
Why wouldn't it be a 3D structural binding epitope with contributions from residues close in space but not close in sequence?
We're not shooting in sequence so only 10 days into the schedule we do the ending of the film.
