Sentence examples for not improved differences from inspiring English sources

Where the signal-to-noise ratio was not improved, differences were usually minimal.

This was also justified in our cohort: patients who rated their back pain as slightly improved after one year compared with those rating their pain as not improved (a difference of 1 point on a 7 point scale) had changed Roland disability scores by an additional 2.2 points; 50% of patients achieving this change (a 1.1 point difference) might still be important clinically.

Quality has not improved and the differences between parties seem to many to be harder to see.

In the analysis of the unsupervised follow-up included in these 2 studies (22, 23), weight-loss maintenance was not improved (weighted mean difference: −0.7 kg; 95% CI: −3.0, 1.8; P = 0.63; median unsupervised follow-up duration: 24 mo).

No significant differences were observed between improved and not improved for any outcomes by 8 months.

As shown in Tables 5 and 6, large signals always decreased in size or resolved completely in the 4 subjects where CNS syndromes were ameliorated by treatment (a representative case is shown in Figure 1B and 1C), but were unchanged in the 3 subjects where CNS syndromes did not improve; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.029).

Unexpectedly, this was due to decreased scores in the W intervention group [mean difference = 0.283; (95% CI = 0.093 to 0.474] not improved EM intervention group scores [mean difference = -0.060 (95% CI = -0.268 to 0.148)].

By dividing migraineurs into two groups [(a) improved and (b) not improved] we observed statistically significant differences in the headache frequency, pain intensity, duration of attack and HIT-6 (Table 3).

There were statistically significant differences between the improved and not improved groups at 4 months in the BCTQ SSS and FSS.

There were no differences in CI between those improved and those not improved, neither subjectively nor assessed according to GAF (Table 2).

However, CPT distraction was not improved (F = 0.80, p = 0.497), and there were no significant differences between any paired visits.