not impartial

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not impartial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, opinion, or person that shows bias or favoritism rather than neutrality. Example: "The judge's decision was criticized because it was clear that he was not impartial in the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He is not impartial".

Independent

They're not impartial at all".

The New York Times

It is not impartial.

The Guardian - Opinion

She's not impartial.

The Guardian - Books

"Pakistan: Election Commission Not Impartial".

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Software algorithms, he said, are not impartial.

The New York Times

I'm not impartial in these matters.

The New Yorker

The Egyptians are not impartial mediators.

The Guardian

Even the French encyclopaedist Pierre Larousse was not impartial.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Yet as Tierney himself admitted, he was not impartial.

The New York Times - Magazine

Not necessarily the worst, but clearly not impartial either.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not impartial", ensure the context clearly explains the source or reason for the lack of impartiality. For example, specify the relationship, bias, or interest that compromises neutrality.

Common error

Avoid claiming absolute impartiality; acknowledge potential biases. Instead of asserting complete neutrality, frame your analysis as aiming for objectivity or transparency in your methods.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not impartial" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that the noun lacks neutrality or objectivity. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. For example, one might say "the judge was not impartial", where it describes the judge's lack of neutrality.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not impartial" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote a lack of neutrality or objectivity. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various domains, particularly in News & Media. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the reason for the absence of impartiality is evident. Alternatives like "biased" or "one-sided" may offer suitable substitutions depending on the desired nuance. Recognizing potential biases rather than claiming absolute neutrality enhances credibility. The overall quality assessment affirms consistent usage, source authority, and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

biased

Suggests a prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way that’s considered unfair.

prejudiced

Implies a preconceived judgment or opinion, often based on limited information.

unfair

Indicates a lack of justice or equity in a situation.

one-sided

Describes something that only presents one perspective or point of view.

partisan

Implies strong allegiance to a particular party, faction, or cause.

subjective

Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

tendentious

Expressing or intending to promote a particular cause or point of view, especially in a controversial way.

colored

Influenced or affected by a particular thing; biased.

interested

Having a personal concern or motive that affects impartiality.

skewed

Not accurate or exact; distorted or biased.

FAQs

How can I use "not impartial" in a sentence?

You can use "not impartial" to describe a person, process, or source that exhibits bias. For example: "The investigation was criticized because the lead investigator was "biased" and therefore "not unbiased", making the results "subjective"."

What are some alternatives to "not impartial"?

Alternatives to "not impartial" include "biased", "prejudiced", "unfair", "one-sided", or "partisan". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "not impartial" or "biased"?

Both "not impartial" and "biased" indicate a lack of neutrality, but "biased" often carries a stronger negative connotation. "Not impartial" can be a more neutral way to describe a lack of objectivity.

What does it mean for a judge to be "not impartial"?

If a judge is "not impartial", it means they have a bias or prejudice that could affect their ability to fairly administer justice. This could be due to personal relationships, prior involvement with the case, or strong opinions about the parties involved.