Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not fully validated
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not fully validated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing data, processes, or claims that have not undergone complete verification or confirmation. Example: "The results of the experiment are not fully validated, so we should be cautious in drawing conclusions."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
27 human-written examples
Although not fully validated, previous work suggests that the POA field has clinical validity [ 17, 19- 23].
Science
Although these methods are not fully validated replacements for counting techniques, they are anticipated to be a valid option when appropriate protocols are followed (Linsinger et al. 2012; Wohlleben 2012).
While still not fully validated, profiling of blood cells, exosomes or body fluid miRNAs would represent a tremendous and promising advance in non-invasive diagnostics of CNS disorders.
Science
Even though the test is not fully validated — meaning it may not be foolproof evidence in a doping case or a subsequent lawsuit — antidoping experts say it is promising.
News & Media
A commercially available instrument for airborne lead measurement, AeroLead™, showed promise of becoming fully validated with the addition of design enhancements, although not fully validated by the end of the research program.
Science
However, this method [8] was not fully validated and the separation was carried out using gradient elution with a mobile phase at 40 °C.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
33 human-written examples
Nevertheless, we did not fully validate the asthma questions in Chinese or with Chinese immigrant respondents.
Unfortunately, a recent report on independent series of patients by Yi et al (2012) did not fully validate this nomogram and again the debate about how to manage at best DIN patients has been re-opened.
Science
The SMV codec per se is not used in our experiments as ITU-T P.563 has not been fully validated for such technologies [22].
Although this technique has not been fully validated, it has a good predictive value and has the advantage of not needing a specially trained observer [ 78].
This hypothesis has not been fully validated, mainly because a hierarchical map of cells involved in mammary epitheliogenesis has not yet been established.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not fully validated", clearly state what aspects are lacking validation to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example: "The method is "not fully validated" for pediatric populations."
Common error
Avoid drawing definitive conclusions or making strong recommendations based on data or methods that are "not fully validated". Acknowledge the limitations.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not fully validated" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase modifying a noun. It indicates that the noun in question (e.g., a method, a test, data) has undergone some validation but has not been completely or conclusively verified. Ludwig confirms this usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
79%
News & Media
13%
Formal & Business
8%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "not fully validated" is a useful expression in formal and scientific contexts to indicate that something lacks complete verification or confirmation. Ludwig's analysis confirms that it is grammatically correct and commonly used, especially in scientific and technical writing. While the phrase suggests some uncertainty, it doesn't necessarily imply invalidity. It highlights the need for caution and further investigation, while acknowledging the limitations of the data, methods, or claims being discussed. Consider using related phrases like "partially validated" or "incompletely validated" based on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
partially validated
Indicates validation has occurred to some degree, but not entirely.
not completely validated
Emphasizes the lack of complete validation.
incompletely validated
Highlights the unfinished nature of the validation process.
not entirely validated
Similar to 'not completely validated', stressing the absence of total validation.
partly verified
Suggests that only a portion has been checked or proven.
partially confirmed
Indicates some confirmation exists, but not full confirmation.
not definitively proven
Focuses on the absence of conclusive proof.
lacking full validation
Highlights the deficiency in the validation process.
validation pending
Suggests validation is still in progress or yet to occur.
not yet established
Indicates that something has not yet reached a firm or proven status.
FAQs
How can I use "not fully validated" in a sentence?
You can use "not fully validated" to describe data, methods, or claims that have not undergone complete verification or confirmation. For example, "The assessment methods were "not fully validated"." It's often followed by an explanation of the limitations.
What can I say instead of "not fully validated"?
You can use alternatives like "partially validated", "incompletely validated", or "not completely validated" depending on the context.
Is it appropriate to use "not fully validated" in formal writing?
Yes, "not fully validated" is appropriate in formal writing, especially in scientific or technical contexts where precise language is important. It's crucial to accurately represent the status of research or findings.
What's the difference between "not fully validated" and "invalid"?
"Not fully validated" means that something lacks complete verification but may still have some value or partial validity. "Invalid" implies that something is incorrect or has no validity whatsoever. The first one requires more investigation, the second one is discarded.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested