Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not fully ascertain
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not fully ascertain" is not correct in standard English.
The correct form would be "not fully ascertained" or "not fully ascertainable." Example: "The results of the experiment are not fully ascertained, requiring further analysis."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Without identifying RA as an underlying condition, epidemiological studies that rely on information from death certificates may not fully ascertain the morbidity and mortality of the disease.
Even when additional data sources are used, current surveillance does not fully ascertain the extent of workplace-related disease in the United States (Azaroff et al. 2002).
Although we demonstrated that the presence of detectable levels of mtDNA TOP1 was a constant and particular feature of SScFib+ patients, we did not fully ascertain the antigenic role of this protein fragment and its relation with the development of lung fibrosis.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Current systematized evidence has not fully ascertained the impact of CHG-WC in bacteremia within the ICU.
Although the role of psychoactive substances in impairing driving ability is documented, the precise relationship between consumption and degree of driving impairment is not fully ascertained for several substances.
Science
Although the exact distance of the RBS from the start codon is not fully ascertained in this study; it is likely that a 5-10n RBspacerer is important, as an RBS further away from the start codon could be less efficient in melting secondary structure in the critical region.
Science
Given the estimated prevalence (∼1 in 40,000) of RTHβ, with over 160 different TRβ mutations being recorded hitherto, it is highly likely that RTHα is more common but not fully ascertained, either because the disorder lacks a clearcut, diagnostic signature of biochemical abnormalities or is associated with unexpected phenotypes (e.g. autism spectrum disorder).
However, the role, interactions and effect of these immunosuppressive agents as well as other concurrent infectious and non infectious agents not studied in the disease process could not be fully ascertained.
Science
While the exact growth mechanism of CNTs/CNFs formed from fly ash as a catalyst has not been fully ascertained, it appeared that tip growth could not be discounted (as seen by the red-coloured circles in Figure 1e,f).
Science
The complex mechanisms by which they move have not been fully ascertained, and such mechanisms differ among various species.
Encyclopedias
As many serosubtypes were rare, their individual clustering behavior could not be fully ascertained.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When indicating incomplete knowledge, use grammatically correct phrases such as "not fully ascertained" or "not fully ascertainable" for formal contexts. For informal contexts, consider "not completely understood" or "partially determined".
Common error
Avoid using the base form "ascertain" directly after "fully". The correct forms are the past participle "ascertained" or the adjective "ascertainable" depending on the intended meaning.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not fully ascertain" attempts to express a state where something is not completely determined or understood. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is grammatically incorrect in standard English.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "not fully ascertain" is an incorrect grammatical construction. As Ludwig AI highlights, the correct forms are "not fully ascertained" (past participle) or "not fully ascertainable" (adjective). While the intent is to express incomplete knowledge or understanding, the incorrect grammar detracts from its effectiveness. Consider using alternatives like ""not completely understood"" or ""partially determined"" for clarity and grammatical correctness. Although examples exist in scientific and news sources, adhering to correct grammar ensures more effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
not completely understood
Emphasizes the lack of complete understanding.
not entirely clear
Focuses on the clarity of the situation, indicating some ambiguity.
not definitively known
Indicates a lack of definitive knowledge about a subject.
partially determined
Focuses on the determination aspect, implying that only a portion is known.
remains uncertain
Suggests ongoing doubt or lack of confirmation.
partially known
Highlights that only a part of the subject is known.
not yet confirmed
Emphasizes that something still requires confirmation.
incompletely established
Highlights that the establishment of facts or details is not yet finished.
not thoroughly investigated
Focuses on the depth of investigation, implying it was insufficient.
unresolved
Indicates that the matter is still open and has not been settled.
FAQs
How to use "not fully ascertained" in a sentence?
Use "not fully ascertained" to indicate that something is not completely determined or understood. For example, "The long-term effects of the treatment are "not fully ascertained"".
What can I say instead of "not fully ascertain"?
Alternatives include "not completely understood", "partially determined", or "incompletely established". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Which is correct, "not fully ascertain" or "not fully ascertained"?
"Not fully ascertain" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""not fully ascertained"", using the past participle.
What's the difference between "not fully ascertained" and "not fully ascertainable"?
"Not fully ascertained" describes something that has been investigated but not completely determined, while "not fully ascertainable" describes something that cannot be completely determined, often due to inherent limitations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested