Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

not for reuse

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not for reuse" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something, such as a document or material, should not be used again or repurposed. Example: "This document is marked as confidential and is not for reuse under any circumstances."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The only not-for-profit reuse store within New York City limits is Build It Green!

News & Media

The New York Times

possible to check the results in our paper and is not ment for reuse.

This data is not sufficient for reuse in the design of a new product.

All leftover scrap pieces of lead that are not suitable for reuse, including lead tape, should be put in the red bucket labeled "Lead for Recycling" in the CHESS Ops area.

Furthermore, the programs are built on the code that directly connects with runtime systems, so they are not easy for reuse.

However, the use of these parameters was considered not feasible for reuse of baseline VOIs due to (severe) image artefacts that were observed in the registered images.

Furthermore, as programs are built on the code that directly connect with the running systems, they are not easy for reuse.

Most published halftones and color illustrations, for example, have a screen (if you look at a photograph under 10x magnification you will see the screen) and thus are not suitable for reuse as either scanned images or photocopies (even when photocopied in graphic mode).

The public is bombarded with products that are not designed for reuse.

News & Media

HuffPost

Do not store for reuse.

In our study we show that the existing models that have been investigated are not suitable for reuse without substantial modifications.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When designating items as "not for reuse", clearly communicate the reason, such as hygiene concerns, material degradation, or intended lifespan.

Common error

Avoid assuming users will automatically understand that an item is "not for reuse". Explicitly state this restriction to prevent misuse or potential harm.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not for reuse" functions as a restrictive modifier, indicating a limitation on the usability of a particular item or resource. Based on Ludwig AI's response, this phrase is grammatically sound and serves to specify that something should not be used again.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not for reuse" is a grammatically correct phrase used to explicitly state that an item or resource should not be used again. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While examples are limited, the phrase functions as a restrictive modifier to prevent misuse, maintain hygiene, or adhere to intended guidelines. Alternative phrases like "single-use only" or "disposable" can be used to convey a similar meaning. When using this phrase, it is important to clearly communicate the reason for the restriction to avoid any potential confusion.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "not for reuse"?

Consider using phrases like "single-use only", "disposable", or "for one-time use only" for similar meanings.

What does "not for reuse" typically imply?

It generally implies that an item is designed or intended for a single use due to factors such as hygiene, material degradation, or specific design limitations.

Is it always clear when something is "not for reuse"?

No, it's often necessary to explicitly state that an item is "not for reuse" to avoid confusion and potential misuse, especially in contexts where reuse might seem reasonable.

What are some reasons why something might be "not for reuse"?

Reasons can include hygiene concerns (e.g., medical equipment), material degradation after one use (e.g., certain plastics), or design limitations that prevent safe or effective reuse.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: