not for redistribution

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not for redistribution" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to clearly state that something should not be distributed by someone other than you. For example, you can write "This content is protected by copyright and is not for redistribution."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Not for redistribution.

University of California, Berkeley

For papers covered by ACM copyright, what is provided are my/my co-authors' version of the work, posted by permission of the ACM for your personal use, and not for redistribution or commercial use.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

These pages have been removed either because they are no longer supported, they point to old versions of our archived website, or they are proprietary content not intended for redistribution.

Columbia University

I am not whining for redistribution.

Huffington Post

In a 2013 paper by Matthew Luttig, of the University of Minnesota, backed up this finding, noting, "the absolute level and the changing structure of inequality have largely been a force promoting conservatism, not increasing support for redistribution as theoretically expected".

The New Yorker

Note that not all genomes in the warehouse are available as full data sets in the CPGR as these genomes are either still in progress or are not currently available for redistribution to third party sites such as the CPGR.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Perhaps surprisingly, the researchers found that supplying information didn't increase support for redistribution to the poor.

The New Yorker

They are posted here for your personal use, not for resale or redistribution.

University of California, Berkeley

But the estate tax is not about confiscating wealth for redistribution, but about encouraging spending during a wealthy individual's lifetime and limiting the intergenerational transfer of wealth.

Huffington Post

In contrast to other developed countries, the authors note that "the elderly in the U.S. are the only immutable group entitled to government health insurance". In other countries where inequality has increased but there is already universal health care, the elderly haven't decreased their support for redistribution.

HuffPost

But these men were speaking for, not against, redistribution — redistribution from the 99 percent to people like them.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not for redistribution", clearly state who retains the rights and what uses are permitted. For instance, specify "This material is not for redistribution; all rights are reserved by [Your Name/Organization]".

Common error

Avoid using "not for redistribution" without clearly defining the permitted uses. If you allow personal use but not commercial use, explicitly state that to prevent confusion and potential misuse.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not for redistribution" primarily functions as a restrictive modifier. It indicates a limitation on how a particular item or piece of information can be used or disseminated, as seen in Ludwig's examples regarding copyrighted material and proprietary content.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not for redistribution" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase to prevent your content from being distributed by someone other than you. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. It's most frequently found in academic, news, and scientific contexts, reflecting its formal and restrictive nature. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define what uses are permitted to avoid any ambiguity and possible misuse. Similar restrictions can be expressed using phrases like "rights reserved" or "for personal use only".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cannot be copied or distributed

Explicitly forbids copying and distribution, directly echoing the meaning of "not for redistribution".

restricted distribution

Highlights that the distribution is limited and controlled.

for personal use only

Specifies that the content is restricted to individual, non-commercial use.

rights reserved

Indicates that all rights are retained by the copyright holder, preventing unauthorized use.

all rights reserved

Emphasizes a complete reservation of rights, similar to "not for redistribution".

no unauthorized duplication

Directly prohibits creating copies without permission, akin to restricting redistribution.

copyright protected

Indicates copyright protection, inherently limiting redistribution rights.

do not copy

A simple command restricting copying, similar to restricting redistribution.

for internal use only

Specifies usage is limited within a specific organization.

license required for use

Highlights that a license is necessary before using or sharing the content.

FAQs

How can I use "not for redistribution" in a sentence?

You can use "not for redistribution" to indicate that a particular work cannot be distributed without permission. For example: "This document is not for redistribution without the express written consent of the author."

What is a phrase similar to "not for redistribution"?

A similar phrase is "for personal use only". Both phrases restrict how the content can be used, ensuring it's not shared beyond the intended audience.

What does "not for redistribution" mean in the context of copyrighted material?

In the context of copyrighted material, "not for redistribution" means that the material cannot be copied, shared, or otherwise distributed by anyone other than the copyright holder without explicit permission.

Is it necessary to include a copyright notice along with "not for redistribution"?

While not strictly necessary, including a copyright notice alongside "not for redistribution" reinforces the protection and clarifies ownership. It is a best practice to include both to provide maximum clarity.