Sentence examples for not explicitly acknowledged from inspiring English sources

Especially significant changes were made in 2011 following up the WB consultative process7 and explicitly acknowledged by the World Bank.8 These changes also meant that there were important breaks in the data series, but they are especially difficult to track in the used composite indicators if changes are not explicitly acknowledged.

They defend this conventional element: "a philosophical point, widely appreciated by philosophers of science, but often not explicitly acknowledged by scientists, deserves to be noted in relation to this: conventional elements almost always enter into theoretical reasoning in science (Nagel 1961; Sarkar 1998).

With all the talk of war, the Administration has not explicitly acknowledged, let alone explained to the American people, the immense post-war commitment that will be required to create a stable Iraq.

In particular, ethical and colloquial (e.g., not based on scientific evidence) considerations are inherent to the thought process underlying healthcare decisionmaking [ 21, 43] but are often not explicitly acknowledged or discussed, let alone communicated to other stakeholders.

Although asked twice about the Holocaust, he did not explicitly acknowledge its existence.

The original memorial did not explicitly acknowledge the role of New Yorkers in the war.

This may have been out of U.S. deference to Turkey and Russia, which do not explicitly acknowledge Tehran's push for a nuclear weapon.

But bioethicists said that medical schools must take responsibility for faculty members whose publications do not explicitly acknowledge the work of writers receiving industry support.

Mr. Assad, in remarks to his cabinet reported by the official SANA news agency, did not explicitly acknowledge the proximity of the fighting, but said "we live in a state of war".

This policy instrument does not explicitly acknowledge potential trade-offs that might emerge from trying to reach two different policy objectives.

Clarke does not explicitly acknowledge that "something always was" is ambiguous between a stronger, de re reading and a weaker, de dicto reading.