Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not erroneous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not erroneous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is accurate or correct, often in a formal or technical context. Example: "The results of the experiment were not erroneous, confirming the initial hypothesis."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(9)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
15 human-written examples
He is John Giuca, not Guica; the spelling on the T-shirts was not erroneous.
News & Media
Then how can you consistently maintain that my beliefs in all these false statements are not erroneous?
Rarest of all is a fact that was not erroneous in the original manuscript but became an error in the checking process.
News & Media
It follows from the point of view of the coverage of the act that it was not erroneous to refuse to consider the evidence which petitioners offered as to the wholesomeness of the compounds.
Academia
Slow electrode kinetics and the common lack of internal equilibrium of redox processes in pollution plumes make, with a few exceptions, direct electrochemical measurement and rigorous interpretation of redox potentials dubious, if not erroneous.
My prediction was not "erroneous". It was an appropriate conclusion from the information available at the time, and it led to the discovery of the data from 1990 that showed the asteroid to be "safe". That outcome was not only encouraging, but also illustrative of how the scientific process works.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
45 human-written examples
This type of management isn't erroneous, insists David Mech, a wolf expert and adjunct professor at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
Science & Research
That adopted recommendation was not clearly erroneous.
News & Media
This finding was not clearly erroneous and must be affirmed.
Academia
Not surprisingly, erroneous sightings and fruitless leads have become commonplace.
News & Media
He concluded that the finding of the trial judge was not clearly erroneous.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not erroneous", consider whether a more direct synonym like "accurate" or "correct" would suffice. The choice depends on the desired tone and the level of formality.
Common error
Avoid using "not erroneous" in contexts where simpler, affirmative language would be clearer and more direct. Overusing double negatives can make your writing sound convoluted and less persuasive.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not erroneous" functions as an adjective phrase expressing negation. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates that something is accurate or correct, effectively denying the presence of mistakes or inaccuracies. Examples from science, news, and academia showcase its use across various domains.
Frequent in
Science
41%
News & Media
33%
Academia
26%
Less common in
Wiki
8%
Encyclopedias
8%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "not erroneous" is a formal way to assert that something is accurate or correct. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and suitability for formal contexts, such as academic, scientific, and legal writing. While direct synonyms like "accurate" or "correct" may often suffice, "not erroneous" offers a stronger emphasis on the absence of error, making it particularly useful when precision is paramount. Remember to avoid overusing double negatives for clarity and consider the context to determine the most appropriate wording.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
accurate
Direct synonym, indicating a lack of error.
correct
Another direct synonym, implying conformity to fact or truth.
factually correct
Emphasizes the adherence to factual information.
valid
Implies that something is well-founded and sound.
free from error
A more explicit way of stating the absence of mistakes.
true
A fundamental term indicating correspondence with reality.
without mistakes
Similar to "free from error", but perhaps slightly less formal.
precise
Suggests a high degree of accuracy and exactness.
well-founded
Suggests a solid basis in evidence or reasoning.
on point
Indicates relevance and accuracy in a particular context.
FAQs
What does "not erroneous" mean?
The phrase "not erroneous" means that something is accurate, correct, or free from error. It is a formal way of saying that there are no mistakes or inaccuracies.
When is it appropriate to use "not erroneous" in writing?
It is appropriate to use "not erroneous" in formal or technical writing where precision is important. However, in more casual contexts, simpler terms like "accurate" or "correct" may be preferable.
What are some alternatives to saying "not erroneous"?
Some alternatives to "not erroneous" include "accurate", "correct", "valid", "true", or "factually correct". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is "not erroneous" the same as "correct"?
While "not erroneous" and "correct" have very similar meanings, "not erroneous" tends to be more formal and is often used in legal or technical settings where the absence of any error needs to be emphasized.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested