not clearly mentioned

USAGE SUMMARY

"not clearly mentioned" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to point out that something was not explicitly stated. For example, "The exact time was not clearly mentioned."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

The second issue with this approach is that the authors have not clearly mentioned how to assign credits to the packets, which is clearly a non-trivial issue as effective candidate set selection depends upon it.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

It looks like almost data mining systems provide suites of data mining tools or software and put efforts on dealing with big and streaming data but how to efficiently meet application requirements and associated design approaches are not clearly mentioned or described.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

The reason was not clearly mentioned in 3 studies.

British Journal of Cancer

We apologize that this was not clearly mentioned in the previous version.

eLife

Also the basis for choosing only those 12 superfamilies is not clearly mentioned.

F1000Research

For the rest of the studies, method of recruitment was not clearly mentioned.

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

In this analysis the surveys were excluded, as well as some other papers that do not clearly mention the applied algorithm.

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

The majority of the literature did not clearly mention the analytic perspective.

BMC Health Services Research

The fact that several RCTs did not clearly mention adverse effects demonstrates the poor reporting standards of acupuncture research.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Referee Comment: "Perhaps the major problem I have with the way this model is presented is that the authors do not clearly mention its scope of application.

F1000Research

Perhaps the major problem I have with the way this model is presented is that the authors do not clearly mention its scope of application.

F1000Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not clearly mentioned", ensure the context makes it clear what the expected level of detail or explicitness should have been. This avoids ambiguity about whether the omission was significant.

Common error

Avoid using "not clearly mentioned" when expressing a personal opinion about clarity. Instead, focus on objective factors or provide specific examples of what was unclear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not clearly mentioned" functions as an adverbial modifier indicating the degree to which information was conveyed. It suggests that while something might have been alluded to, it lacked sufficient clarity or detail. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not clearly mentioned" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a lack of explicitness or detail. Ludwig AI confirms it is suitable for a variety of contexts, including scientific writing, news reporting, and business communications. It's especially useful when pointing out deficiencies in communication or areas where more clarity is needed. While versatile, it's important to maintain objectivity and avoid subjective interpretations when using this phrase. Related phrases like "not explicitly stated" or "not adequately detailed" can provide a more formal tone if needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not explicitly stated

Replaces "clearly mentioned" with a more formal "explicitly stated", emphasizing a lack of directness.

not plainly indicated

Substitutes "clearly mentioned" with "plainly indicated", focusing on a lack of obvious signaling.

not distinctly specified

Replaces "clearly mentioned" with "distinctly specified", highlighting a lack of precise detailing.

not adequately detailed

Shifts focus from mentioning to the level of detail provided, suggesting insufficient information.

not sufficiently elaborated

Emphasizes the lack of expansion or development on a topic, rather than just a lack of mentioning.

left unsaid

Implies a deliberate omission, where the information was not spoken or written.

omitted from discussion

Highlights the absence of the topic from a conversation or formal debate.

glossed over

Suggests the information was treated lightly and passed over quickly, lacking thoroughness.

not gone into deeply

Indicates a lack of thorough exploration or analysis of a subject.

not touched upon

Indicates the subject was barely referenced or considered.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "not clearly mentioned" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "not explicitly stated", "not distinctly specified", or "not adequately detailed".

Is it always negative to say something was "not clearly mentioned"?

Generally, yes. It implies a deficiency or lack of thoroughness in communication. However, context is key; sometimes, it might simply be a neutral observation.

What's the difference between "not clearly mentioned" and "not mentioned"?

"Not clearly mentioned" suggests it was alluded to but without sufficient detail. "Not mentioned" implies complete omission.

In what types of writing is "not clearly mentioned" most appropriate?

It is suitable for analytical writing, reports, and reviews where objectivity and critical assessment are important, especially when you want to highlight that details are missing or not detailed enough.