not be liable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not be liable" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that a party is not responsible for certain actions or outcomes. Example: "The company will not be liable for any damages incurred during the event."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Consumers should not be liable to pay for the costs of any software update.

Independent

In any given year, millions of households will not be liable for federal income taxes.

The New York Times

the copy, the copy shop may not be liable for copyright infringement.

Stanford University

But service providers would not be liable for failure to do so.

The New York Times

The airlines should not be liable for claims from victims other than passengers.

The New York Times

That fund will not be liable for any losses incurred in the company's rescue.

The New York Times

For the same reason, Mr. Posilkin said, landlords should not be liable for triple damages.

The New York Times

This would guarantee top quality group matches that would not be liable to abuse.

The Guardian - Sport

But those who hand over their claim to Schrems will not be liable for any costs.

The Guardian - Tech

"Internet service providers, Facebook and Google should not be liable for what their users are doing.

The Guardian

"We will not go in and remove people, but we will not be liable for their safety".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In user agreements or terms of service, use "not be liable" to specify what your company is not responsible for, such as damages arising from misuse of the product or service.

Common error

Avoid using "not be liable" without specifying the context or limitations. Overly broad exclusions can be legally challenged and may not protect you from all potential liabilities. Always define the specific circumstances under which liability is excluded.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not be liable" functions as a predicate adjective phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage in legal and formal contexts to specify the absence of legal responsibility or obligation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Academia

31%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not be liable" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the absence of legal responsibility. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it frequently appears in legal, business, and journalistic contexts, clarifying the limits of liability for various parties. When using this phrase, it's crucial to define the specific circumstances under which liability is excluded to avoid overly broad exclusions. Alternatives such as "not be responsible" or "be exempt from" can be used depending on the context and desired formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not be held liable

Adds emphasis on the act of being held responsible.

not be responsible

Replaces 'liable' with 'responsible', indicating a lack of accountability.

not be accountable

Substitutes 'liable' with 'accountable', suggesting no obligation to answer for something.

not incur liability

Focuses on avoiding the state of being legally bound.

bear no liability

Uses a more formal tone to express the absence of responsibility.

not be answerable

Indicates a lack of obligation to explain or justify something.

not carry responsibility

Highlights the absence of a duty or obligation.

not be subject to

Indicates an exemption from a certain obligation or requirement.

be exempt from

Expresses a formal release from duty or payment.

not be chargeable

Implies that no costs or fees can be applied.

FAQs

What does "not be liable" mean?

The phrase "not be liable" means not being legally responsible for something. It indicates that a person or entity is not obligated to pay damages or fulfill a duty in a particular situation.

What's the difference between "not be liable" and "not be responsible"?

While "not be liable" and "not be responsible" are often used interchangeably, "not be liable" typically has a stronger legal connotation. "Not responsible" can be used in more general contexts to indicate a lack of accountability.

When should I use "not be liable" in my writing?

Use "not be liable" when you want to clearly state that someone is legally exempt from responsibility for potential damages, debts, or other obligations. This is common in contracts, disclaimers, and legal notices.

What are some alternatives to saying "not be liable"?

Alternatives to "not be liable" include "not be accountable", "be exempt from", or "bear no liability". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.