Exact(6)
Possibly (but improbably) for this reason, in an effort to illustrate (or not) ambiguity in a series, the coverage of O'Connor v. Oakhurst Dairy served up a lot of food imagery.
If there are no definitions of show or no definitions of read in the typing context, again there is an error, but of unsatisfiability, not ambiguity.
Of course, given what has been discussed, this looks to be more like a case of under-specificity, or simply ignorance of a word's meaning (in 1787), not ambiguity.
It is most helpful to focus on the questions that have solid answers, not ambiguity or things we can't change.
Explicit descriptions, not ambiguity or omission, best serve the interests of all readers.
However, it is important to find answers to the question whether or not ambiguity tolerance is malleable, and can thus be taught or developed or if ambiguity tolerance is determinate, and thus may be useful as a selection tool in medical education.
Similar(54)
I do not like ambiguity for ambiguity's sake.
Pietroski and Hornstein (2002) argue that many of these cases aren't ambiguities at all and prefer a pragmatic explanation of the multiple readings.
Not much ambiguity there.
Not much ambiguity in that.
Brandt was not beyond ambiguity himself.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com