not allowed to use

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not allowed to use" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a prohibition or restriction regarding the use of something. Example: "Students are not allowed to use their phones during the exam."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

You are not allowed to use calculators on any exam.

Harvard University

Children under 14 are not allowed to use the bikes.

The New York Times

She was not allowed to use the bathroom.

The New York Times

"They were not allowed to use it," she said.

The Guardian

Pitchers, meanwhile, are not allowed to use it.

The New Yorker

No, they are not allowed to use ski poles.

The New York Times

He is not allowed to use the Internet.

The New York Times

We're not allowed to use black to promote our doughnuts?

The New Yorker

The N.H.L. is currently not allowed to use such videos.

The New York Times - Sports

You are not allowed to use string concatenation for any XML-related tasks.

University of California, Berkeley

Students are not allowed to use the School's shops unless they have satisfactorily completed this course.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not allowed to use", clearly state the reason for the restriction to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of just saying, "Calculators are not allowed to use", specify, "Calculators are not allowed to use on the exam".

Common error

Ensure the context makes it clear who is "not allowed to use" something. Avoid sentences like "The system is not allowed to use", which lacks clarity. Specify, for example, "New users are not allowed to use the system until they complete training".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not allowed to use" primarily functions as a restrictive modifier. It indicates a condition or limitation on who or what can utilize a particular object, service, or resource. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

18%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not allowed to use" is a common and grammatically correct way to express prohibition or restriction. Ludwig AI confirms this. Its frequency is "very common", with the majority of examples found in "News & Media" and "Academia". The phrase functions as a restrictive modifier, informing and enforcing rules. While acceptable in various contexts, it's important to provide clear context to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "prohibited from using" or "forbidden to use" can be used depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prohibited from using

Formally restricts usage; indicates a strict ban.

forbidden to use

Emphasizes a strong interdiction against usage.

cannot be used

States the impossibility of using something, often due to rules or conditions.

not permitted to use

Indicates that permission for usage has been denied.

must not use

Expresses a requirement to avoid using something.

unable to utilize

Indicates a lack of ability or permission to use something.

barred from using

Suggests an official or legal exclusion from using something.

denied the use of

Emphasizes the act of refusing access or permission to use something.

restricted from employing

Highlights the limitation placed on using something actively.

precluded from using

Suggests that circumstances or rules prevent usage.

FAQs

What does "not allowed to use" mean?

The phrase "not allowed to use" means that someone is prohibited or restricted from using something, often due to rules, regulations, or specific conditions.

What can I say instead of "not allowed to use"?

You can use alternatives like "prohibited from using", "forbidden to use", or "not permitted to use" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "not allowed to use"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct to say "not allowed to use". It is a common and widely accepted way to express that someone is prohibited from using something.

What is the difference between "not allowed to use" and "cannot be used"?

While both phrases indicate a lack of usability, "not allowed to use" typically implies a prohibition or restriction imposed by an external authority, while "cannot be used" often suggests an inherent limitation or inability due to technical or practical reasons.