Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Kruskal-wallis test was used to investigate the difference in the median total number of malaria episodes experienced per child among those admitted and those not admitted with malaria.
Patients are not admitted with PU as a main condition, but have underlying chronic conditions affecting their daily functioning.
The post hoc analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing the VAS score of those not admitted with those admitted for 4 days or more (p value < .05).05
The malaria-attributable fractions for seizures is a predictive measure of the proportion of children not admitted with seizures if malaria was completely eliminated (Smith et al., 1994; Koram and Molyneux, 2007).
IM was significantly more common in children of mothers who were married than in children of mothers who were single (p < 0.001): ninety seven per cent of children admitted with IM had a married mother compared with 90% of children who were not admitted with IM (Table 2).
Similar(55)
The StO2 was higher in patients who were not admitted compared with patients with LOS > 7 days (80.2 ± 8.7% vs 76.9 ± 9.2%, P = 0.009).
All patients were followed up by study investigators at 8 and 30 days, either via hospital medical files or after a telephone call in those patients not admitted or with short hospital stay.
All infants who were not admitted were classified with mild disease, irrespective of m-RDAI score.
The outcomes were compared between babies whose mothers were admitted and not admitted to hospital with the diagnoses of mental illness.
Inclusion of the 10 ICUs that had not admitted any patients with A(H1N1) would have lowered global Flu-OR but would not have changed the maximal Flu-ORs that we observed.
Review methods Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of neuraminidase inhibitors in children aged ≤12 in the community (that is, not admitted to hospital) with confirmed or clinically suspected influenza.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com