Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not a police
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not a police" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to refer to a police officer or the police force in general. Example: "He is not a police; he is a security guard."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Not a police officer.
News & Media
"I'm not a police officer".
News & Media
"France is not a police state".
News & Media
This is not a police state.
News & Media
Mr. Flores is not a police officer.
News & Media
It's not a police procedural.
News & Media
"We are not a police organization".
News & Media
Britain is not a police state.
News & Media
The association is not a police force".
News & Media
It is not a police guard".
News & Media
But this is not a police procedural.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "not a police" in formal writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "not a police officer" or "not part of the police force".
Common error
Using "not a police" implies that "police" is a singular noun that can be preceded by the indefinite article "a". This is grammatically incorrect. Use the correct construction such as "not a police officer" or "not part of the police" instead.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not a police" functions as a negative statement attempting to negate an association with the police force. However, it's grammatically flawed, as identified by Ludwig AI, because "police" is typically used as a collective noun.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "not a police" is frequently found, particularly in News & Media, it's considered grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the more appropriate alternatives are "not a police officer" or "not part of the police force". When writing, it is advised to choose these grammatically sound alternatives to ensure clarity and accuracy. Although the intent is generally clear, adopting correct usage enhances credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
not a police officer
More grammatically correct and commonly used alternative.
not part of the police force
Emphasizes not being affiliated with the police.
not involved with the police
Focuses on the lack of connection or engagement with police activities.
not a member of law enforcement
Broader term indicating no affiliation with any law enforcement agency.
not with the police department
Specifies not being employed by or associated with the police department.
not a law enforcement official
Similar to 'not a member of law enforcement' but emphasizes official status.
not connected to the police
Highlights the absence of any link or association with the police.
unrelated to the police
Indicates no relationship or connection to the police.
not employed by the police
Specifically states not being an employee of the police.
outside the police department
Highlights being external to the police organization.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say someone isn't a member of the police?
The correct phrases are "not a police officer" or "not part of the police force". The phrase "not a police" is grammatically incorrect.
What can I say instead of "not a police"?
You can use alternatives like "not a police officer", "not involved with the police", or "not connected to the police" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "not a police" or "not a police officer"?
"Not a police officer" is the correct phrase. "Not a police" is grammatically incorrect in standard English.
When is it appropriate to say someone is "not a police officer"?
This phrase is appropriate when you want to clarify that someone does not hold the position of a police officer or is not affiliated with a police department. This could be to distinguish them from other authority figures, such as security guards, or to emphasize their civilian status.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested