Sentence examples for normative comparison from inspiring English sources

Most previous studies have used a normative comparison approach that defines health and dysfunction on the basis of established norms for the specified outcome measure to define the outcome trajectories [ 34, 38].

In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive analysis and tested hypotheses on occupants' behavioral responses to a normative comparison feedback program, in addition to the impact of notifications on the level of engagement of each group of occupants.

Results for the normative comparison and disaggregation components were inconclusive, while results for the rewards and penalization component suggest that a revision to the penalization aspect of the component may be necessary.

We categorized occupants who participated in the normative comparison feedback program into three groups (i.e. low, medium, and high energy consumers) based on their baseline energy consumption, and tested 9 hypotheses.

Study design: The Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA) had 468 children with ADHD and 279 others from the same classrooms (local normative comparison group, LNCG) with smoke-exposure data.

The contribution of this paper is two-fold: (1) reporting that the effectiveness of the notifications in eco-feedback programs are initially highly dependent on the type and the nature of the program, and then the interval and the content of the notification, and (2) demonstrating the variability of occupants' behavioral responses under the same normative comparison eco-feedback program.

Through this approach, we sought to expand traditional bibliometric analyses beyond citation counts to include normative comparisons across journals and fields, visualization of co-authorship across the networks, and assess the inclusion of publications in reviews and syntheses.

Through this approach, we sought to expand traditional bibliometric analyses beyond citation counts to include normative comparisons, network analysis and visualization techniques, and assessment of inclusion in reviews and syntheses.

To that end, our purpose was to assess the presence, performance, and impact of scientific publications by the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks since the 2006 reorganization through a comprehensive bibliometric evaluation that included normative comparisons, collaborative network analyses, and inclusion in research syntheses.

Different studies use different samples for normative comparisons.

There were several limitations associated with the normative comparisons and our analyses.