Sentence examples for normative argumentation from inspiring English sources

Both now and in the future, a normative argumentation framework, using bioethical principles in conjunction with other practical tools such as casuistry, offers a reasonable approach to improving decisions that involve human health impacts.

It has been suggested that in order to accomplish the goals of teaching ethics, a student should become familiar with the structure of normative argumentation and the distinctions and knowledge required to arrive at sound ethical decisions [ 9].

This will be done by: First, making a case for the relevance of normative argumentation to these concerns Secondly, applying bioethical principles to some specific decisions that are introduced by the use of biomonitoring technologies Biomonitoring of humans for markers of chemical exposure has burgeoned because of better sensitivity and decreased cost of the analytical techniques.

In its efforts to combine empirical social inquiry and normative philosophical argumentation, Critical Theory presents a viable alternative for social and political philosophy today.

The analysis of fallacies belongs to the normative study of arguments and argumentation, and to give an account of what the fallacy in a given argument is will involve making reference to some norm of argumentation.

Toward a normative model of rational argumentation for critical accounting discussion.

There are two branches of argumentation: on a normative level, the sustainability principle is interpreted from an anthropocentric point-of-view; sustainability in this context means to provide ecosystem services on a broad scale and a long-term basis, including the attempt to avoid unspecific ecological risks.

Their arguments and public interventions about Islam and Muslims do not seem to have any higher or normative purpose or any sophisticated argumentation, beyond mocking Muslims and satisfying the cravings of religious and cultural bigots who latch on to their sound bites with delight.

On the basis of defeasible logic and argumentation, this paper proposes an autonomous, normative and guidable agent model, called ANGLE, to cope with these challenges.

Brock has convincingly reported on the need to distort philosophical normative reasoning on the premises of non-philosophical argumentation in order to avoid unfortunate misunderstandings in practical policy-making [ 14].

Following contemporary argumentation theorists, Habermas assumes one cannot fully articulate these normative presuppositions solely in terms of the logical properties of arguments.