Sentence examples for normalized for speed from inspiring English sources

In this study, once the metabolic energy consumption was normalized for speed, the correlation improved 62.5 % for Wtot, 4.3 % for Wext, and more than doubled for Wint.

However, once normalized for speed to express energy efficiency (net O2 cost) (Fig.  2), prediction equations (Table  2) show moderate, but significant relationship for external work (Wext) (r = 0.49, p ≤ 0.01), internal work (Wint) (r = 0.66, p ≤ 0.00), and total work (Wtot) (r = 0.63, p ≤ 0.01).

However, to demonstrate the physiological work (O2 cost) for a given task, the physiological equivalent rate will also be normalized for speed to express the physiological work per unit distance (ml/kg/m) which is used to depict energy efficiency [ 10].

Normalized for baseline speed, patients were slower on pitch judgments and faster on timbre judgments in noninterference conditions.

This is done by constructing the singular value diagram of the block Hankel matrix for the normalized wind speed data as shown in Figure 5.

If our reasoning is sound, one might argue that we should have also found group differences for the normalized wind speed estimates in the three simulated wind speed conditions, or at least in the lowest wind speed condition.

For each trial, the normalized wind speed estimate was defined as the wind speed estimate for each separate trial (per participant), divided by the average estimate based on all 144 trials per participant.

The data presented represents the normalized speed for all the samples divided by the average observed in N2 controls alone and are represented as fold change mean ± s.d. of three independent trials for every strain or temperature condition.

In Fig.  7, the normalized wind speed estimates are plotted for the three nominal wind speeds, averaged over all wind directions.

In addition, Rodríguez-Ruiz et al. [ 26] reported sex differences in the normalized response speed (Vrn) in the musculature responsible for extension and flexion of the knee joint.

The responses peaked on average 33 ms earlier to normal-speed than slow-motion bars (231 ± 3 vs. 264 ± 12 ms; F1,10 = 8.6; P = 0.015), and the normalized responses were on average a third stronger to normal-speed than slow-motion bars (normalized values 76.1 ± 6.6% vs. 58.2 ± 5.6%; main effect for speed F1,10 = 18.2; P = 0.002).