normalized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'normalized for' can be used in written English.
It is usually used to mean to adjust or account for a certain factor. For example, "The results were normalized for statistical variability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

We will discuss results normalized for these items.

TechCrunch

were normalized for the modified nitrification kinetics.

Chemical Engineering Journal

And whatever is normalized for Mattis and McMaster today will be available to their successors tomorrow.

Vice

The symptoms and the challenges of this stage need to be reframed and normalized for girls.

Huffington Post

It's becoming increasingly normalized for people to feel like their real lives are online.

Vice

The results were normalized for cell density.

Plosone

Corticosterone concentrations were normalized for recovery.

Plosone

The resulting tokens were then normalized for intensity and pitch.

Plosone

BPF, normalized for subject head size, was estimated with SIENAX.

Plosone

The data are then normalized for comparison.

Biochemistry

All results were normalized for protein concentration.

Critical Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting statistical or experimental results, clearly state what variables were used to "normalize for". For example, "Results were normalized for age and gender to reduce bias."

Common error

Avoid using "normalized for" without specifying the variable that was normalized. For example, instead of saying "Data was normalized", specify "Data was normalized for population size."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "normalized for" functions as a prepositional phrase, primarily used to modify a verb or noun. Ludwig AI indicates that it specifies the variable or factor that has been accounted for in a data set or situation, ensuring a more accurate comparison or analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "normalized for" is a prepositional phrase commonly used to indicate that data or results have been adjusted to account for specific variables. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. It's primary function is to clarify and qualify data by specifying the factor that has been considered, leading to more accurate and fair comparisons. To ensure clarity, it's essential to specify the variable being normalized. This is a common and important phrase in scientific and technical writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adjusted for

This alternative directly indicates that a correction or modification has been made to account for a specific factor.

corrected for

Similar to "adjusted for", this phrase implies that errors or biases have been removed or lessened.

standardized for

This term highlights the process of bringing different measurements or values to a common standard for comparison.

accounted for

This indicates that a factor has been considered and its effect has been included or explained.

controlled for

This implies that measures were taken to minimize or eliminate the influence of a particular variable.

taking into account

This phrase indicates that a particular factor is being considered when making a judgment or calculation.

factoring in

Similar to "taking into account", this phrase suggests that a specific element is being included in calculations or considerations.

with respect to

This phrase specifies that the data or analysis is being considered in relation to a particular variable.

relative to

This alternative highlights the comparison of data in relation to a specific baseline or factor.

in relation to

This suggests that the data are being evaluated and presented with consideration of a specific aspect or factor.

FAQs

How do I use "normalized for" in a sentence?

You can use "normalized for" to indicate that data has been adjusted to account for a particular variable. For example, "The infection rates were "adjusted for" population density to provide a more accurate comparison between regions."

What does it mean to say something is "normalized for" a particular factor?

To say something is "normalized for" a factor means that data has been adjusted to remove the influence of that factor, allowing for a fairer comparison. This is often done to account for differences in sample sizes, demographics, or other variables that could skew results.

What's the difference between "normalized for" and "standardized for"?

While similar, "normalized for" typically implies adjusting data to fit a specific scale or range, while "standardized for" often involves transforming data to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Both aim to make data comparable but use different methods.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "normalized for"?

Alternatives to "normalized for" include ""adjusted for"", "corrected for", or "accounted for". The best choice depends on the specific context and the type of adjustment being made.