Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
In Table 4, there are three occurrences that were statistically elevated based on the 95% standard normal significance test, but were nonsignificant based on the WSRT procedure.
Figure 1 is a map of the 95% standard normal significance tests of the difference between the directly age-standardized, county-specific female lung cancer incidence rates for 1988–2007 and the corresponding overall Minnesota rate [ 21, 25].
The WSRT procedure reduced the impact of statistical artifacts that are frequently encountered with standard normal significance testing of the difference between directly age-adjusted county and the overall state cancer rates.
Results of the 95% standard normal significance determinations yielded 6 (6.9%) counties with low rates and 14 (16.1%) with significantly higher age-adjusted rates than the overall Minnesota rate.
Similar(56)
Provided results were normal, significances were calculated using a Student's t Test and P values adjusted posthoc with a Bonferroni correction.
The resulting distribution of number of interactions was assumed to be normal and significance calculated using a Z-test.
When normal, the significance of the difference in the means was assessed using a standard Student's t test for distributions with equal variance, or the Welch-Satterthwaite-corrected Student's t test for distributions with unequal variance.
As relative position of ROP patches along trichoblasts did not follow a normal distribution, significances of differences between distributions were analysed employing the KS-test with a significance level at P<0.05 as described (Pietra et al., 2013).
Table 9 contains a summary of the 95% standard normal level of significance and the significance determined by the WSRT procedure.
The normal or pathological significance of these findings is correlated with design, surface, and fixation of the prosthetic components.
Thus, 81 (46.6%) of the 174 comparisons were considered as significantly low by the 95% standard normal test of significance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com