Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"normal lung function" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to the capacity of the lungs to process air and transfer oxygen throughout the body. For example, "The doctor ran tests to ensure that the patient was still exhibiting normal lung function."
Exact(60)
IPF < 50% FVC indicates a pulmonary fibrosis patient with poor lung function; COPD > 80% FEV1 indicates a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient with relatively normal lung function.
An effect on airway smooth muscle was not seen, presumably because the patients had normal lung function.
We propose that IL-22 is critical for recovery of normal lung function and architecture after influenza infection.
In the following decades, persons severely disabled by cystic fibrosis, emphysema, sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis, or severe primary pulmonary hypertension were able to achieve nearly normal lung function several months after the procedure.
Likely, this relates to many more immediate problems confronting the clinician treating those with severe OI and the presumption of normal lung function in mild OI.
Half of smokers with normal lung function nevertheless have lung damage and symptoms of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), according to a study published online in New England Journal of Medicine.
All had never smoked, and had normal lung function.
Patients are believed to be born with normal lung function, but significant damage is seen early on in life.
All subjects in this group had normal lung function, but were current smokers or never smoked and were with or without an allergy.
Increased AUC CV > 20%) values were also detected among subjects who had normal lung function tests but indications of conditions associated with ventilation disturbances.
This excessive and uncontrolled deposition of ECM compromises normal lung function and structure [1], [3].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com