Sentence examples for normal grip from inspiring English sources

MGA was computed as the maximum distance in 3D space between thumb and index (normal grip) or thumb and little finger (awkward grip) markers during the hand movement.

The extent of overshoot was similar for real and pantomime actions in magicians (normal grip: t 9) = 1.63, p = 0.14; awkward grip: t 9) = 0.45, p = 0.66), but significantly different in controls (with real overshot higher than pantomimed overshoot), again for both grips (normal grip: t 9) = 4.26, p = 0.001; awkward grip: t 9) = 4.63, p = 0.002).

However, the control group showed a significantly smaller MGA for pantomimed actions than real actions for both grasp types (normal grip: t 9) = 5.2, p = 0.001; awkward grip: t 9) = -3.8, p = 0.004).

Critically, there was a significant interaction of ACTION x GROUP (F 1,18) = 6.08, p = 0.024), in that MGA did not differ between real and pantomimed actions in the magicians (Figure 2c), for either kind of grasp (normal grip: t 9) = 1.95, p = 0.10; awkward grip: t 9) = -1.53, p = 0.16).

Normal grip generated a force of 1.83 N, which was 2.8% of the maximum voluntary grip force.

Therefore, lower normal grip force could be exerted in comparison to the cylindrical handle with less evident slippage and rotation.

Although magicians are familiar with pantomimed actions using normal grips, magicians and controls were equally unfamiliar with awkward grips.

It can be also assumed that the normal gripping force of a cylindrical handle would be therefore higher to prevent slippage of the handle.

The actions were performed either by using a normal precision grip (forefinger and thumb) or an awkward precision grip (little finger and thumb).

I managed to use it all right, but I could tell that while the tracking was good, it felt clumsy in my normal-person grip.

Kinetic measures (the vectors orthogonal and normal to the grip on the transducer) were sampled at 1000 Hz from the force transducers to yield grip and load forces.