normal communication skills

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "normal communication skills" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the typical level of ability someone has in conveying and receiving messages effectively in various contexts. Example: "In this role, we expect candidates to possess normal communication skills to interact with clients and team members effectively."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Science & Research

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

In the exam room, he seemed without normal communication skills; I was increasingly sure that he was on the autistic spectrum.

The New York Times - Health

To determine whether eye contact is essential for developing normal communication skills, Senju and colleagues chose a less extreme example: babies whose primary caregivers (their mothers) were blind.

Science Magazine

The psychologist met with the MS patient and found normal communication skills, unless the consultation room had an elevated temperature.

Clinical interventions in aging

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Generic child health skills and attitudes (LOs n = 25) recur throughout the curriculum such as awareness of normal development, communication skills and awareness of safeguarding.

BMC Medical Education

Intact hearing in early childhood is essential for normal development of communication skills and language.

Huffington Post

Goals regarded as relevant were evaluating children and families, understanding normal child development, and communication skills.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

A new study shows that the children of sightless mothers develop healthy communication skills and can even outstrip the children of parents with normal vision.

Science Magazine

He has communication skills.

Independent

His communication skills are woeful.

Independent

Really good communication skills.

The New York Times

His communication skills are limited.

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's communication abilities, consider whether "normal" is the most accurate descriptor. In many cases, a more specific term like "proficient", "competent", or "effective" might provide a clearer picture.

Common error

Avoid using "normal communication skills" as a benchmark without considering cultural or individual differences. Communication styles vary, and what's considered "normal" in one context might not be in another.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "normal communication skills" functions as an adjective-noun phrase used to describe a typical level of competence in conveying and receiving information. It modifies the noun "communication skills", indicating that they are within the expected range.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Science & Research

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "normal communication skills" is grammatically sound but infrequently used. According to Ludwig AI, it describes communication abilities that fall within an expected range and it is mainly used in scientific contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that "normal" is appropriate, and consider whether more descriptive alternatives like ""effective communication skills"" or ""proficient communication skills"" might be more precise. Be mindful of potential cultural biases associated with defining "normal" communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

typical communication abilities

Replaces "normal" with "typical", emphasizing commonality and expected abilities.

standard communication skills

Substitutes "normal" with "standard", highlighting conformity to a recognized benchmark.

average communication skills

Uses "average" instead of "normal", indicating a median level of skill.

proficient communication skills

Replaces "normal" with "proficient", suggesting a competent level of communication ability.

adequate communication skills

Uses "adequate" instead of "normal", implying a sufficient but not necessarily exceptional level of skill.

competent communication skills

Similar to "proficient", but with a slightly different nuance of capability.

healthy communication skills

Emphasizes the positive and functional aspect of communication.

age-appropriate communication skills

Adds the context of age as a reference for 'normal'.

developmentally appropriate communication skills

Similar to "age-appropriate", but used in the context of child development.

basic communication skills

Indicates a fundamental, entry-level set of communication abilities.

FAQs

How can I describe someone's communication skills more precisely than saying "normal communication skills"?

Instead of "normal communication skills", consider using more descriptive terms like "effective communication skills", "strong communication skills", or "proficient communication skills" to provide a clearer picture of their abilities.

Is it appropriate to use "normal communication skills" in a professional context?

While grammatically correct, "normal communication skills" might be perceived as vague in a professional setting. Specifying the skills, such as "written and verbal communication skills", or "interpersonal communication skills", can be more impactful.

What's the difference between "normal communication skills" and "good communication skills"?

"Normal communication skills" suggests an expected or typical level, while "good communication skills" implies a higher level of competence. The choice depends on the specific context and the intended meaning.

When might "normal communication skills" be a particularly useful phrase?

The phrase "normal communication skills" can be useful when assessing developmental milestones in children, comparing communication abilities across different groups, or when highlighting the absence of communication impairments.