Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Similarly, none of the pair wise t-tests of the 7 life cycle parameters were statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons (Table 3).
None of the pair of formulations showed F1 lower than 15% or F2 higher than 50%, suggesting that all the release profiles are different from each other.
Pair type does not seem to affect the presence or the absence of homologs because none of the pair types in any comparison species deviated significantly from the all pair average.
Similar(57)
We show that, when we employ 2-dimensional orthogonal coordinates Ox1x2, there are uncountably many different self-adjoint extensions pUj of pj≡−i∂/∂xj (j=1, 2), and none of the pairs {pj, qj′}j, j′=1, 2 (qj′≡xj′·) satisfies the Weyl relation.
Clearly, none of the pairs ( f, T ) and ( g, T ) are reciprocal continuous.
However, for God Class, none of the pairs with JDeodorant have versions with an AC1 "Very Good".
In this assessment, we have assumed that none of the pairs of components of the mixtures have non-additive interactions (Step 6).
None of the pair-wise comparisons of the items analysis showed reliable differences.
When we repeat the analyses without the photos of the four individuals who have South American family origins, the test for differences in the mean distance scores between Hispanics, Whites and Native Americans is not significant [Χ2 = 0.880, df = 2, p = 0.644], and none of the pair-wise differences are significant.
Considering pairs of SNPs, none of the pairs show an association with any of the three types of cancer, or all jointly, stronger than the marginal association with rs3738579, indicating that rs3738579 is a better marker than any combination of two SNPs.
Further examination shows that none of the pairs of these 128 array genes were ever tested against each other; thus, most of the genes in this 133-gene partition are likely to be present simply as an artifact of ascertainment bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com