At this point, we study the case 2 more extensively, by choosing a (non-restrictive) specific form for the control functions (g_1 u),~g_2(u)), as follows: begin{aligned} g_1 u)= &,1+frac{ln (1+u)}{ln (1+u_{max })},nonumber g_2 u)= &, frac{ln (1+u_{max } -ln (1+u))} -ln(1+u_{max }{ln
In order to control the proper use of "that" and "which" and the difference between restrictive and non-restrictive, one needs to know about the grammatical behaviors and the semantic interpretations of the dependent relative clauses that are introduced by the relative pronouns (that, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, whose, and which).
Non-restrictive clauses: which, comma (both essential).
"Which John built" is non-restrictive.
It's gone from a restrictive to a non-restrictive abuse-handle.
Crystal identifies a non-restrictive list of 11 distinct non-specialist functions for the exclamation mark.
They don't even want to know what the distinction between a restrictive and a non-restrictive clause might be.
Which is used more often with non-restrictive clauses, and that is only used for restrictive clauses.
A word about relative clauses: restrictive relative clauses (also known as defining, best thought of as giving essential information by narrowing it down) are not enclosed by commas, whereas non-restrictive relative clauses (non-defining, giving non-essential information) are.
In contrast, in a non-restrictive design all flow rates are optimised.
Tangent, non-restrictive, and restrictive horizontal curvatures were assigned to each segment.
