Sentence examples similar to non significant age from inspiring English sources

The associations between age, on the one hand, and total referential anomalies, syntactic complexity, and IQ, on the other hand, were all non-significant: age with referential anomalies: r = 0.127, p = 0.166; age with number of dependents: r = −0.086, p = 0.292; age with embedded clauses: r = −0.072, p = 0.292; age with IQ: r = 0.027, p = 0.419.

In order to exclude the possibility of non-significant age effects simply because of low statistical power due to a small number of cases in the younger group, we did a second set of ANOVAs involving the fourteen older participants without explicit knowledge and the five younger participants with full explicit knowledge.

Non-significant age effects were eliminated from the genetic models.

We observed a non-significant age dependency in our present study of x-ray-induced DNA DSBs.

Model 3 removed the non-significant age term from Model 2 and offered "strong evidence" of improvement as compared to Model 1 (ΔBIC = -6).

The mean ages and the standard deviations for the dyslexic children and for the controls were 11.47 ± 2.12 (range 7 16 years-old) and 12.21 ± 2.25 years (range 8 16 years-old), respectively (non-significant age difference, t-test p = 0.232).

Women who had received a mammogram only outside the screening program had a slightly higher, although also non-significant, age-adjusted relative risk for a breast cancer diagnosis compared to those in the screening program (RRadj = 1∙04, 0∙86 to 1∙26).

There was a similar but non significant trend in age ≤ 35 years (HR = 1.15; p =.44).

For clarity of the presentation, the most parsimonious model for all aptitudes is presented in bold −2LL, minus 2 log likelihood; β1, coefficient of main age effect; β2, deviation of the regression coefficient of age; NS, non significant; P, P value Significance of both β2 and β1 was tested for men and women.

The health gap between socioeconomic groups was small and non-significant at age 16, but demonstrable at age 21 and numerically increasing with age.

The sample was compared to non-responding patients for gender distribution and age, which yielded non-significant results (age: t = -1.489; df = 222; P = 0.138); (gender: Pearson χ2 = 0.011; df = 1; P = 1.000).