non rival

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "non rival" is not standard in written English; the correct term is "non-rival." You can use it in contexts discussing goods or resources that can be consumed by one individual without reducing availability for others.
Example: "Public parks are considered non-rival goods because one person's enjoyment does not diminish another's ability to enjoy the same space."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It is a "non-rival" good: ie, your use of it does not interfere with my use.

The Economist

But as he recovers from his knee injury he has given a wide-ranging interview to Yahoo where he discusses his non-rival, his future and more.

Independent

However, there are often opportunities to bump up your earnings by freelancing for non-rival publications (always check with your editor first).

Independent

Economists think of knowledge, unlike physical goods, as "non-rival": use by one person does not necessarily preclude use by others.…and your huddled mathematiciansBut does all this emigration from the developing world harm the originating countries' capacity for innovation?

The Economist

Many people find it hard to see a need for property rights over non-rival goods—listening to an illegally downloaded MP3 does not draw down the supply of music in the world.

The Economist

Infrastructure both digital and otherwise is used by many for all kinds of activities, and is often to some extent "non-rival", meaning one person's use does not forestall another's.

The Economist

The definition of a public purpose should be limited to "public goods", ie goods which are non-rival (your consumption does not detract from mine) and non-excludable (you enjoy it even if you don't pay for it).But this is not the only economic justification for those powers.

The Economist

Urban warming is a typical example of a public good which is non-rival but excludable.

Journal of Economic Structures

Only if the meeting technology is sufficiently non-rival, price posting is not an equilibrium.

Journal of Economic Theory

While public goods are defined as non-rival and non-excludable, there are degrees of excludability.

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Preferences for these non-rival household activities therefore would reasonably be assumed to be related to preferences for work activities.

IZA Journal of Labor Economics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to goods that do not diminish upon consumption by others, use the grammatically correct term "non-rival".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "non rival" as it is a misspelling of the correct term, "non-rival". Always double-check your spelling to maintain clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "non rival" functions incorrectly as an adjective modifying a noun because it omits the hyphen. The correct form, "non-rival", is used to describe goods or resources where one person's consumption does not reduce availability for others. According to Ludwig, the accurate terminology is "non-rival".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

39%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "non rival" is a misspelling of the term "non-rival", which describes goods or resources that can be consumed without diminishing their availability to others. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct term is "non-rival". This concept is particularly relevant in economics, technology, and resource management. Although "non rival" appears in some sources, it's important to use the correct, hyphenated form to ensure clarity and credibility in writing. Always aim to use "non-rival" when referring to such goods, and consider alternatives like "non-rivalrous", "shared resource", or "public good" depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Non-rivalrous

This is a more formal and grammatically correct term for describing a good whose consumption doesn't diminish its availability to others.

Non-rival good

This phrase explicitly identifies the subject as a 'good' in economic terms, clarifying the context.

Non-diminishable good

This phrase emphasizes the aspect of not being reduced or depleted through use.

Shared resource

This broader term encompasses the idea of a resource available for multiple users without depletion.

Public good

This term, while often related, also implies non-excludability, in addition to being non-rival.

Infinitely scalable resource

Emphasizes the aspect that the resource can expand to accommodate multiple users.

Resource with infinite copies

Focuses on the idea that use of the resource doesn't limit availability because new instances can be created.

Non-competitive resource

Highlights the lack of competition among users for access to the resource.

Jointly consumed good

Describes the good as something that can be consumed simultaneously by multiple users.

Non-excludable resource

This term focuses on the characteristic of being available to everyone, regardless of their contribution.

FAQs

What does "non-rival" mean in economics?

In economics, "non-rival" refers to a good or service that can be consumed by one person without reducing the amount available for others. For example, knowledge is often considered a "non-rival good".

What are some examples of non-rival goods?

Examples of non-rival goods include knowledge, software, and digital music. Unlike a physical item such as an apple, multiple people can 'consume' these goods simultaneously without diminishing their availability.

How does a non-rival good differ from a public good?

While both concepts are related, a "non-rival good" is defined solely by the fact that its consumption by one person doesn't reduce its availability to others. A public good, however, is both non-rival and non-excludable (meaning it's difficult or impossible to prevent people from using it).

Is it correct to say "non rival" instead of "non-rival"?

No, the correct term is "non-rival" with a hyphen. "Non rival" is a misspelling and should be avoided in formal writing.