The phrase "non-questioning" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used as an adjective to describe someone who does not ask questions or question things. Example: As a teacher, I always encourage my students to be curious and inquisitive, but there are inevitably a few non-questioning students in every class who prefer to simply accept information without probing deeper.
At each visit, patients were encouraged to report any adverse effects occurring throughout the study period either spontaneously or in response to general, non-direct questioning.
Such concerns are part of a larger set of criticisms that have run through feminist theorizing since the 1970s, with non-white, non-middle-class, and non-western women questioning the very category of "woman" and the notion that this title could be a boundary-spanning category that could unite women of various walks of life.
"He was just the most dependable, non-questioning person," she said.
The judgment of non-Muslim women is implicit in the non-questioning usage of "modesty" in the Guardian's coverage.
Children, after all, do not vote, do not contribute taxes or monies to campaign funds, and are always used as a political device to scare the gullible and non-questioning public … Paul Panza, Ramona Calif.: Thanks for your articles on child welfare.
Mr. Chidambaram is not the only non-American politician questioning speculators' role as Congress examines the issue.
Some are also unhappy over the appointment of Nigel Mills as a non-executive director, questioning his independence because he is connected to the builders' financial advisers, Citi.
In the first case, however, the shower would be hot, because students expressed their engagement by speaking non-stop, constantly questioning the professors.
Some are also unhappy over Persimmon's appointment of Nigel Mills as a non-executive director, questioning his independence due to his links with the housebuilder's financial advisers, Citi.
We weren't required to pay them for most of our history, but in the early 2000s the federal government challenged our non-taxable status, questioning how we could call ourselves a not-for-profit operating in communities when we operated in all 50 states.
On one hand it was about questioning non-rigorous clinical observations, physio-pathological rationale and experts' authority as reliable pillars of medical knowledge [ 2], and on the other, it proposed the need for new skills: formulation of well structured questions, search and retrieval of the best available evidence, and critical assessment of available medical literature.
