Hence, we must instead focus on cases of disagreement between non-inferentially justified beliefs or, more appropriately, on the propositional content of some non-doxastic basis for such belief.
Some philosophers hold that some beliefs about physical objects are non-inferentially justified, while others hold that this is never so, and that justified beliefs about physical states of affairs are always justified via an inference to the best explanation that starts out from beliefs about one's experiences.
If Thelma could be non-inferentially justified in believing that eating meat is morally wrong, then Louise could also be non-inferentially justified in believing that eating meat is not morally wrong, and Nick could be non-inferentially justified in believing that it is morally wrong to eat vegetables.
What if, rather than holding that there is positive evidence that lends support to the existence of God, one holds instead that the belief that God exists is non-inferentially justified?
They are likely to find the rewards, financial and non-financial justify early action.
High-quality models are often non-linear, justifying the study of nonlinear regression tools.
If intuitions are evidence which non-inferentially justify belief, then even if one ought to suspend judgment in the aforementioned kind of case, it will not follow that one ought to do so in the case of intuitive disagreements.
In general, patients with ≥1 relapse per year, absence of complete recovery from relapses, sustained disability progression of ≥1 and MRI progression, with or without clinical signs, are considered as 'treatment non-responders', justifying the transition from basic to escalation therapy [9].
We study four types of health care utilization, all of which are discrete and non-negative, justifying the use of count data models to estimate the impact of multiple transitions on utilization.
The choice of a non-parametric test was justified by the non-normal distribution of data as confirmed by the Shapiro Wilk test.
Conversely, one crucial premise in the regress argument claims that no moral belief can be justified non-inferentially.
