Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Non-identical data were deleted from the database.
The Cfr9I and SmaI digestion patterns of non-ST398 strains were identical (data not shown).
Since JOINMAP has difficulties with high proportions of non-overlapping missing data, a comparison with identical data input was not possible for the MI-markers combined with censored BI-markers.
Any discrepancies that get introduced unintentionally (e.g., due to non identical checkpoint times) can be resolved by consumers by careful examination of corresponding resource usage data from providers.
The three methods were directly compared using identical data sets.
Studies based on identical data were excluded from this review.
Figure 2 reports the identical data taken from neighboring Bay Area counties.
Therefore, each study collected essentially identical data.
Identical data in both data sources ranged from 73.9%to99.7%73.9%to99.7%
Supporting Evidence for the annotation pipeline includes: BLAST searches against PANDA: PANDA is JCVI's internal repository of non-redundant and non-identical protein and nucleotide data pulled from public databases that include the latest assembly and protein sequences (e.g., GenBank, RefSeq, UniProt, Protein Data Bank).
PANDA is JCVI's internal repository of non-redundant and non-identical protein and nucleotide data built periodically from public databases that include the latest protein sequences (e.g. GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), PDB (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/Welcome.do), UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/) and the Comprehensive Microbial Resource database (http://www.tigr.org/CMR)).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com